Table 6

Automatic word alignment results from batch 5
Batch
 Run
 Resources
 Alignment
 Result














Static
 Statistic
 Dynamic













Stan
 POS
 MeSH
 Statistic partition
 Training partition
 Test partition
 Recall
 Precision
 F-score













2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8


5
 1


X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.80
 0.77
 0.78
5
 2

X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.80
 0.76
 0.78
5
 3
X
X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.77
 0.79
5
 4
X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.77
 0.79
5
 5
 X

X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.76
 0.78
5
 6
 X
X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.77
 0.79
5
 7
 X
 X
X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.77
 0.79
5
 8
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 X
 0.81
 0.77
 0.79

Recall, precision and F-score from the automatic word alignment when resources for the automatic word alignment were generated from all partitions and all partitions were automatically aligned. If the standard resources, the parts-of-speech blocker and the MeSH-dictionary were used or not were instead altered in the 8 possible ways.

Nyström et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007 7:37   doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-37