Peer Review reports
From: The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Moshe Schein |
| 22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Burke |
| 28 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magne Nylenna |
| 21 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harold Lehmann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 7 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harold Lehmann |
| 23 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magne Nylenna |
| 24 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Jun 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Jun 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-6-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.