Table 2 |
|||||
|
Results over test set |
|||||
|
Mod |
RMRS from |
Extra |
R |
P |
F |
|
|
|||||
|
SPEC |
- |
6.97 |
23.73 |
10.77 |
|
|
SPEC |
ERG |
- |
8.96 |
41.86 |
14.75 |
|
SPEC |
fb(ERG, RASP) |
- |
12.44 |
52.08 |
20.08 |
|
SPEC |
cb(ERG, RASP) |
- |
6.47 |
41.94 |
11.21 |
|
SPEC |
ERG |
11.44 |
26.14 |
15.92 |
|
|
SPEC |
fb(ERG, RASP) |
9.95 |
28.17 |
14.71 † |
|
|
SPEC |
cb(ERG, RASP) |
7.46 |
24.19 |
11.41 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
NEG |
- |
19.55 |
30.94 |
23.96 |
|
|
NEG |
- |
Negex |
17.83 |
12.73 |
14.85 |
|
NEG |
ERG |
- |
11.82 |
35.62 |
17.75 |
|
NEG |
fb(ERG, RASP) |
- |
13.64 |
34.09 |
19.48 |
|
NEG |
cb(ERG, RASP) |
- |
12.73 |
33.33 |
18.42 |
|
NEG |
ERG |
19.55 |
32.33 |
24.36 |
|
|
NEG |
fb(ERG, RASP) |
19.55 |
32.58 |
24.43 |
|
|
NEG |
cb(ERG, RASP) |
20.91 |
41.07 |
27.71 † |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Results over the test data using the UTurku Task 1 system ("fb" = fallback strategy, where we use the first source if possible, otherwise the second; "cb" = use undifferentiated RMRSs from each source to create feature vectors). † denotes the feature set which performed best over the development set using gold Task 1 annotations. |
|||||
|
MacKinlay et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012 12(Suppl 1):S4 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-S1-S4 |
|||||