Open Access Open Badges Research article

Nuclear medicine technologists are able to accurately determine when a myocardial perfusion rest study is necessary

Elin Trägårdh*, Liselott Johansson, Camilla Olofsson, Sven Valind and Lars Edenbrandt

Author Affiliations

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilssons gata 49, 205 05, Malmö, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012, 12:97  doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-97

Published: 4 September 2012



In myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), typically a stress and a rest study is performed. If the stress study is considered normal, there is no need for a subsequent rest study. The aim of the study was to determine whether nuclear medicine technologists are able to assess the necessity of a rest study.


Gated MPS using a 2-day 99mTc protocol for 121 consecutive patients were studied. Visual interpretation by 3 physicians was used as gold standard for determining the need for a rest study based on the stress images. All nuclear medicine technologists performing MPS had to review 82 training cases of stress MPS images with comments regarding the need for rest studies, and thereafter a test consisting of 20 stress MPS images. After passing this test, the nuclear medicine technologists in charge of a stress MPS study assessed whether a rest study was needed or not or if he/she was uncertain and wanted to consult a physician. After that, the physician in charge interpreted the images and decided whether a rest study was required or not.


The nuclear medicine technologists and the physicians in clinical routine agreed in 103 of the 107 cases (96%) for which the technologists felt certain regarding the need for a rest study. In the remaining 14 cases the technologists were uncertain, i.e. wanted to consult a physician. The agreement between the technologists and the physicians in clinical routine was very good, resulting in a kappa value of 0.92. There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations made by technicians and physicians (P = 0.617).


The nuclear medicine technologists were able to accurately determine whether a rest study was necessary. There was very good agreement between nuclear medicine technologists and physicians in the assessment of the need for a rest study. If the technologists can make this decision, the effectiveness of the nuclear medicine department will improve.

Image interpretation; Radionuclide imaging; Ischemic heart disease; 99Tc MPS