Table 4 |
|||||
|
Studies of clinical outcomes using interventions of office/hospital-based telemedicine. |
|||||
|
Outcomes |
Quality Score |
Clinical Specialty |
Sample |
Intervention |
Effects |
|
|
|||||
|
Wootton[37] |
II-B |
Dermatology |
204 patients |
Need for special follow-up (RCT) |
No difference in need for follow-up |
|
Brennan[36] |
I-A |
Emergency Medicine |
100 patients |
Patients randomized to local or telemedicine care (RCT) |
No difference in ER return or need for additional care |
|
Rosenfeld[38] |
II-B |
Intensive Care |
201 patients |
Addition of remote intensivist to surgical ICU |
Decreases in severity-adjusted ICU mortality (46–68%) and hospital mortality (30–33%). Decreases in ICU complications (44–50%) and ICU length of stay (30–34%). |
|
Rendina[39] |
II-B |
Neonatology |
314 patients |
Length of stay in NICU for telemedicine vs. no telemedicine |
Length of stay decreased significantly related to birth weight |
|
Goh[40] |
III-B |
Neurosurgery |
116 patients |
Neurosurgery transfer before and after teleradiology |
Fewer adverse events during transfer (8% vs. 32%) |
|
Goh[41] |
III-B |
Neurosurgery |
63 patients |
Head injury patients with teleradiology |
Fewer adverse events during transfer (6.4% vs. 32.1%) |
|
|
|||||
|
Hersh et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:5 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-1-5 |
|||||