Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch article

Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogue

Donald J Willison1,2 email, Marilyn Swinton3 email, Lisa Schwartz1,4 email, Julia Abelson1,5 email, Cathy Charles1,5 email, David Northrup6 email, Ji Cheng7 email and Lehana Thabane1,2 email

Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Institute for Social Research, York University, Toronto, Canada

Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada

author email corresponding author email

BMC Medical Ethics 2008, 9:18doi:10.1186/1472-6939-9-18

Published: 19 November 2008

Additional files

Additional File 1:

Pre-dialogue survey. Questionnaire given to participants prior to the dialogues where they rated their level of support for each of the three general approaches to use of personal information for research and the 5 specific research scenarios.

Format: DOC Size: 40KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Additional File 2:

Post-dialogue survey. Questionnaire given to participants following the dialogues where they rated their level of support for each of the three general approaches to use of personal information for research and the 5 specific research scenarios.

Format: DOC Size: 57KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer

Additional File 3:

Comparison of attitudes toward privacy and health research of dialogue participants recruited through the full and short surveys. Comparison of attitudes toward privacy and health research of dialogue participants recruited through the full and short surveys. The purpose of this is to compare for selection biases.

Format: DOC Size: 91KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.