Table 3 |
|||
|
Predictors of the attitudes for withholdings in Case 1 and 2, and for withdrawal of tube feeding in Case 3* |
|||
|
Odds Ratio [95% CI] |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Predictors |
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
|
|
|||
|
Female (male) |
0.7 [0.3 – 1.5] |
0.6 [0.4 –1.1] |
1.2 [0.5 – 2.7] |
|
Age over 50 (younger age) |
0.8 [0.4 – 3.0] |
0.7 [0.4 – 1.5] |
1.2 [0.4 – 3.1] |
|
Surgical specialty (others) |
0.5 [0.2 – 2.1] |
0.6 [0.3 – 1.2] |
0.3 [0.1 – 1.1] |
|
Large volume facility over 500 beds (under 500 beds) |
0.3 [0.1 – 0.9] |
1.3 [0.7 – 2.4] |
1.3 [0.6 – 2.9] |
|
Primary care clinic (hospital) |
0.9 [0.4 – 2.2] |
0.8 [0.4 –1.5] |
0.9 [0.4 – 2.2] |
|
Urban area (rural) |
1.5 [0.7 – 3.0] |
0.2 [0.4 – 1.2] |
1.4 [0.7 – 2.7] |
|
"Frequently" consult with colleagues ("very seldom" or "no") |
0.4 [0.3 – 1.6] |
1.0 [0.5 – 1.8] |
0.8 [0.3 – 2.0] |
|
"Have experience of consultation" with ethics committees (have no experience) |
2.1 [0.8 – 6.2] |
1.0 [0.4 – 2.2] |
6.4 [2.5 – 16.3] |
|
|
|||
|
* Reference category in parentheses * If the independent variables were missing, there were indicated as reference data. |
|||
|
Bito and Asai BMC Medical Ethics 2007 8:7 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-8-7 |
|||