Table 1 |
|
|
Methods of clinical ethics research |
|
|
Theoretical |
|
|
→ |
Philosophy (e.g., How should decisions on setting priorities be made legitimate |
|
and fair?) |
|
|
→ |
Theology (e.g., What Catholic values should guide decisions on setting priorities |
|
in Catholic hospitals?) |
|
|
→ |
Law (e.g., What practices in setting priorities in a regional health authority might |
|
constitute discrimination?) |
|
|
→ |
Policy (e.g., What policy should governments follow in funding new technologies |
|
in medicine?) |
|
|
Empirical |
|
|
→ |
Social sciences (e.g., How do regional health authorities in developing countries |
|
make decisions on setting priorities?) |
|
|
→ |
Decision analysis (e.g., How do you trade-off considerations of equity and |
|
efficiency in decisions on setting priorities?) |
|
|
→ |
Clinical epidemiology (e.g., What are the criteria used to allocate liver |
|
transplants?) |
|
|
→ |
Health services research (e.g., How does the delivery of cardiac surgery vary by |
|
patient gender or ethnicity?) |
|
|
|
|
|
Singer et al. BMC Medical Ethics 2001 2:1 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-2-1 |
|