Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Ethics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee

Arja Halkoaho1*, Anna-Maija Pietilä2, Mari Vesalainen3 and Kirsi Vähäkangas3

Author Affiliations

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Research Unit/Research Ethics Committee, University Hospital of Kuopio, P.O Box 1777, 70210 , Kuopio, Finland

2 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Social and Health Care Services, Kuopio, Finland

3 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Ethics 2012, 13:20  doi:10.1186/1472-6939-13-20

Published: 8 August 2012

Abstract

Background

Many studies have been published about ethics committees and the clarifications requested about the submitted applications. In Finland, ethics committees require a separate statement on ethical aspects of the research in applications to the ethics committee. However, little is known about how researchers consider the ethical aspects of their own studies.

Methods

The data were collected from all the applications received by the official regional ethics committee in the Hospital District of Northern Savo during 2004–2009 (n = 688). These included a total of 56 studies involving research on tissue other than blood. The statements by the researchers about the ethics about their own research in these applications were analyzed by thematic content analysis under the following themes: recruitment, informed consent, risks and benefits, confidentiality and societal meaning.

Results

The researchers tended to describe recruitment and informed consent process very briefly. Usually these descriptions simply stated who the recruiter was and that written consent would be required. There was little information provided on the recruitment situation and on how the study recruiters would be informed. Although most of the studies were clinical, the possibility was hardly ever discussed that patients could fail to distinguish between care and research.

Conclusion

The written guidelines, available on the webpages of the ethics committee, do not seem to be enough to help researchers achieve this goal. In addition to detailed guidelines for researchers, investigators need to be taught to appreciate the ethical aspects in their own studies.

Keywords:
Thematic content analysis; Ethical views of scientists; Application to ethics committee; Informed consent; Recruitment