Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 May 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Saskia Sanderson |
9 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nina Hallowell |
22 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth |
5 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nina Hallowell |
1 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth |
9 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Saskia Sanderson |
6 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jürgen Barth |
12 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Robyn Hyde-Lay |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
18 Jun 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Jun 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-10-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.