|
Knowledge of institutional policies for research intensive and community-based medical schools |
||||
| Respondent Group |
Test Statistic |
|||
|
|
||||
| All Respondents1 |
Research Intensive |
Community-Based |
||
|
|
||||
| For medical education studies that require IRB review, to which IRB would you submit your application? (N = 117) |
||||
| University |
61 52% |
29 58% |
27 47% |
χ2 = 3.66 |
| Medical center |
46 39% |
20 40% |
24 42% |
|
| Other |
9 8% |
1 2% |
5 9% |
|
| Don't know |
1 1% |
0 0% |
1 2% |
|
| Does your institution have stated policies on the use of existing educational evaluation data for faculty scholarship? (N = 110) |
||||
| Yes |
30 27% |
7 16% |
11 20% |
χ2 = 1.71 |
| No |
20 18% |
15 33% |
12 22% |
|
| Unsure |
60 55% |
23 51% |
32 58% |
|
| Which best describes procedures in place at your medical school for obtaining consent from students to use their performance data and test scores for educational research & scholarship? (N = 115) |
||||
| Students can decline consent |
24 21% |
6 12% |
3 5% |
χ2 = 2.75 |
| Matriculation conditional on consent |
11 10% |
8 16% |
14 25% |
|
| There are no procedures |
50 43% |
21 43% |
26 46% |
|
| Don't know |
30 26% |
14 29% |
13 23% |
|
| Have you participated in discussions with others at your institution about IRB requirements for using evaluation data for faculty scholarship? (N = 119) |
||||
| Faculty in your department |
53 45% |
23 46% |
24 41% |
χ2 = 0.31 |
| Faculty in other departments |
24 20% |
13 26% |
11 19% |
χ2 = 0.85 |
| College faculty meetings |
9 8% |
6 12% |
0 0% |
χ2 = 7.49** |
| Dean, administrator, etc. |
19 16% |
12 24% |
5 9% |
χ2 = 4.96* |
| Other |
17 14% |
6 12% |
9 15% |
χ2 = 0.24 |
| No discussions reported |
50 41% |
21 42% |
25 42% |
χ2 = 0.002 |
|
1: Includes respondents who classified their institution as "other" * p < .05; ** p < .01 | ||||
Mavis and Henry BMC Medical Education 2005 5:12 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-12 |
||||