Peer Review reports
From: Using entrustable professional activities to guide curriculum development in psychiatry training
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Brittlebank |
| 16 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clare Oakley |
| 2 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Parkin |
| 7 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 23 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Boyce |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 23 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-96 |
You can find further information about peer review here.