Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 May 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lubomir Tomaska |
8 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niccolo' Faccioli |
14 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathleen FitzPatrick |
21 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Rawson |
8 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Rawson |
3 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathleen FitzPatrick |
14 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
11 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
24 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
24 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
28 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-10-39 |
You can find further information about peer review here.