Table 1 |
||
|
Comparison of results of the new THFV with those with conventional hypodermic needles. |
||
|
Feature |
New FNAB needle device (5 by each of 4 CP-Total 20) |
Hypodermic needle (5 by each of 4 CP-Total 20) |
|
|
||
|
Cellularity of direct smears |
Moderate to marked (Figure 6c) |
Mild to hypocellular (Figure 6f) |
|
Density of tissue fragments in cell block |
Moderate to marked (Figure 6a,b) |
Mild to hypocellular (Figure 6d,e) |
|
Tissuecrit¶ (Figure 5) |
70–100 μl (Mean 87, SD 10)* |
17–30 μl (Mean 24, SD 4)* |
|
Technical ease§ |
1–2 |
2–3 |
|
|
||
|
DS, direct smear, CP, cytopathologists, SD, standard deviation. ¶Volume of tissue microfragments procured with FNAB procedure and rinsed in CytoRich Red® fixative (AutoCyte Inc, Elon College, NC) for cell block preparation after preparing direct cytology smears. The tissue microfragments were compacted as sediments under gravity for fixed duration (Figure 5). *p value < .0001, Student t-test. §Scale of 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult). |
||
|
Shidham et al. BMC Clinical Pathology 2007 7:2 doi:10.1186/1472-6890-7-2 |
||