Table 2 |
||||
|
Discrepancies between individual study pathologists' WSI-based reports |
||||
|
Case |
Part |
Specimen |
At Issue |
Discrepancy Type |
|
|
||||
|
37 |
1 |
Bladder Biopsy |
Tumor Grade* |
Type 3 |
|
38 |
1 |
Bladder Biopsy |
Dysplasia v Benign |
Type 4* |
|
Granulomatous Inflammation? |
Type 2 |
|||
|
2 |
Bladder Biopsy |
Granulomatous Inflammation? |
Type 2 |
|
|
40 |
1 |
Bladder Biopsy |
Tumor Grade |
Type 3 |
|
Superficial Invasion? |
Type 3 |
|||
|
45 |
1 |
Bladder Biopsy |
Muscle Invasion? |
Type 1 |
|
50 |
2 |
Skin Biopsy |
Atypical Melanocytic Lesion: Invasion? |
Type 4* |
|
52 |
1 |
Skin Biopsy |
Actinic Keratosis versus Seborrheic |
Type 3 |
|
Keratosis with HPV infection |
||||
|
54 |
1 |
Bladder Biopsy |
AK versus Artifact |
Type 3 |
|
55 |
1 |
Skin Biopsy |
Junctional versus Compound Nevus |
Type 2 |
|
57 |
2 |
Prostate Bx |
Atypical Glands (Cancer v HGPIN) |
Type 4* |
|
|
||||
|
Description: There were 12 discrepancies between study pathologists' WSI-based reports. Of these, sub-optimal image quality was implicated in 4 instances (38, 50 and 57). See text for the definition of the "discrepancy types". |
||||
|
Gilbertson et al. BMC Clinical Pathology 2006 6:4 doi:10.1186/1472-6890-6-4 |
||||
