|
Summary of Differences in EMG-Measurement Changes Dependent on Intervention for Squared MNF (N = 29) |
||||
| Massage |
Rest |
|||
|
|
||||
| Time of Measurement (sec.) |
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
|
|
||||
| 2 – 4 |
2.31 |
0.7 |
2.19 |
0.64 |
| 4 – 6 |
2.39 |
0.64 |
2.28 |
0.59 |
| 6 – 8 |
2.38 |
0.64 |
2.25 |
0.59 |
| 8 – 10 |
2.35 |
0.64 |
2.25 |
0.54 |
| 10 – 12 |
2.30 |
0.64 |
2.22 |
0.59 |
| 80 – 82 |
1.69 |
0.54 |
1.69 |
0.48 |
| 82 – 84 |
1.69 |
0.48 |
1.66 |
0.48 |
| 84 – 86 |
1.69 |
0.54 |
1.63 |
0.48 |
| 86 – 88 |
1.68 |
0.54 |
1.63 |
0.48 |
| 88 – 90 |
1.65 |
0.54 |
1.62 |
0.48 |
|
Note. MNF – measure was scaled by division by 100, and squared due to a left-skewed distribution. | ||||
Tanaka et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2002 2:9 doi:10.1186/1472-6882-2-9 |
||||