Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Scientific Abstracts Presented at the International Research Congress on Integrative Medicine and Health 2012

Open Access Poster presentation

P02.11. Adherence and satisfaction with the experimental mind and body intervention in the LIFE weight loss maintenance study

C Elder1*, L DeBar1, K Funk1, W Vollmer1, N Lindberg1, C Ritenbaugh2, G Meltesen1, C Gallison3 and V Stevens1

  • * Corresponding author: C Elder

Author affiliations

1 Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA

2 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

3 Healing Touch Acupuncture, Portland, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12(Suppl 1):P67  doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-S1-P67

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/S1/P67


Published:12 June 2012

© 2012 Elder et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Purpose

To provide an in depth analysis of adherence and satisfaction with the mind and body intervention for participants in the LIFE weight loss maintenance trial.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of 142 obese participants who had lost at least 10 pounds in a conventional weight loss program and who were randomized to the experimental weight loss maintenance intervention. This experimental intervention consisted of instruction and application of an energy psychology intervention, Tapas Acupressure Technique (TAT®). TAT practice combined self-acupressure with a prescribed set of mental steps. Participants were advised to practice TAT at home daily. The main outcome measure was self reported frequency of TAT practice.

Results

Sixty-six percent of TAT participants attended at least six of the eight intervention sessions, and the drop out rate was 3.5%. Almost half of TAT participants reporting practicing TAT at home on average for 2-3 days per week, while 8% reported on average zero days per week of TAT practice and 2% reported daily TAT practice. Sixty-two percent reported practicing less than 10 minutes/session, while 27% reported practicing 10-20 minutes/session. Satisfaction was significantly correlated with less weight regain (p=.001), and a majority of participants reported that they were at least somewhat likely to continue using TAT. Frequency of TAT home practice was not significantly associated with changes in weight, stress, insomnia, depression, or quality of life.

Conclusion

The data suggest moderate acceptance and adherence with the TAT intervention. However our analyses showed no association between frequency of TAT home practice and clinical outcomes. Further research is required toward identifying and achieving optimal levels of home practice in clinical trials of energy psychology techniques.