Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Scientific Abstracts Presented at the International Research Congress on Integrative Medicine and Health 2012

Open Access Poster presentation

P05.36. How do lay people conceptualise and reason about the use of placebos in healthcare?

F Bishop1*, A Adams2, E Aizlewood1 and G Lewith1

  • * Corresponding author: F Bishop

Author Affiliations

1 University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

2 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12(Suppl 1):P396  doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-S1-P396


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/S1/P396


Published:12 June 2012

© 2012 Bishop et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Purpose

Despite the prevalence and ethically contentious nature of the use of placebos in clinical practice and clinical trials, few studies have explored the perspectives of the general public. Our aim was to identify how lay people conceptualise and reason around the use of placebos in healthcare.

Methods

Eleven focus groups were held with adult volunteers. Participants were purposefully recruited from rural and urban areas in the Midlands and South of England. They came from a range of walks of life, including students, professionals, home-makers, and retired people. Inductive thematic analysis was facilitated by Atlas.ti.

Results

All participants recognised the term ‘placebo’ and exhibited diverse opinions as to how the placebo effect works and whether the placebo effect even exists. Honest doctor-patient communication was highly valued by participants, who typically saw placebo prescriptions as deceitful and therefore wrong. However, they also expressed the belief that that deception is necessary for the patient to experience potentially beneficial placebo effects. A pragmatic orientation was exhibited, wherein participants argued that if a placebo “works” then it is acceptable for a doctor to prescribe it. Placebos were considered more acceptable in certain circumstances, including self-limiting illness (e.g. common cold) and clinical trials (compared to clinical practice).

Conclusion

Both a pragmatic orientation and an understanding of mind-body healing mechanisms seem to facilitate greater acceptance of placebos in medical research and clinical practice. Seeing deception as necessary to elicit placebo effects seems to prompt ethical concerns about the use of placebo in clinical practice. The views of the general public should be taken into account when researchers and doctors consider using placebos; these findings could be used to inform the development of more acceptable practices related to the use of placebos.