Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, and apoptotic activity of stem bark extracts of Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook. f

Abstract

Background

Cephalotaxus spp. are known to possess various therapeutic potentials. Cephalotaxus griffithii, however, has not been evaluated for its biological potential. The reason may be the remoteness and inaccessibility of the habitat where it is distributed. The main aim of this study was to: (1) evaluate multiple biological potentials of stem bark of C. griffithii, and (2) identify solvent extract of stem bark of C. griffithii to find the one with the highest specific biological activity.

Methods

Dried powder of stem bark of C. griffithii was exhaustively extracted serially by soaking in petroleum ether, acetone and methanol to fractionate the chemical constituents into individual fractions or extracts. The extracts were tested for total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant (DPPH radical scavenging, superoxide radical scavenging, and reducing power models), antibacterial (disc diffusion assay on six bacterial strains), cytotoxic (MTT assay on HeLa cells), and apoptotic activity (fluorescence microscopy, DNA fragmentation assay, and flow cytometry on HeLa cells).

Results

Among the three extracts of stem bark of C. griffithii, the acetone extract contained the highest amount of total phenolics and flavonoids and showed maximum antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic (IC50 of 35.5 ± 0.6 μg/ml; P < 0.05), and apoptotic (46.3 ± 3.6% sub-G0/G1 population; P < 0.05) activity, followed by the methanol and petroleum ether extracts. However, there was no significant difference observed in IC50 values (DPPH scavenging assay) of the acetone and methanol extracts and the positive control (ascorbic acid). In contrast, superoxide radical scavenging assay-based antioxidant activity (IC50) of the acetone and methanol extracts was significantly lower than the positive control (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis suggested that phenolic and flavonoid content present in stem bark of C. griffithii extracts was responsible for the high antioxidant, cytotoxic, and apoptotic activity (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Stem bark of C. griffithii has multiple biological effects. These results call for further chemical characterization of acetone extract of stem bark of C. griffithii for specific bioactivity.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook. f., a gymnosperm belonging to the family Cephalotaxaceae, is commonly known as Griffith's plum yew. A shrub or small tree, it is found up to an altitude of 2000 m and is distributed in northeastern India, western Sichuan province in China, and Myanmar [1]. Traditional healers of Manipur, a northeastern state of India, use tablets made from C. griffithii bark to treat cancer. Cephalotaxus spp. have previously been reported to exhibit various biological activities including anticancer [2], osteoblast differentiation [3] and antioxidant activity [4]. It has also been reported that the flavonoids present in Cephalotaxus spp. were mainly responsible for such biological activities [2–4]. However, research on C. griffithii has been very limited. This may be because of the remoteness and limited accessibility of the habitat of this species. So far, only two phytochemical analyses from C. griffithii have been attempted. Kamil et al. [5] isolated and characterized six flavonoids, and Phutdhawong et al. [6] carried out chemical analysis of volatile oil from needles of C. griffithii. To our knowledge, to date no data are available on the biological effects of phytochemicals extracted from C. griffithii. The main aim of this study was therefore to: (1) evaluate the biological potential of stem bark of Cephalotaxus griffithii (SBCG), and (2) identify solvent extract of stem bark of C. griffithii to find the one with the highest specific biological activity.

Results

Extraction yield, total phenolic and flavonoid content

Table 1 shows the extraction yield, total phenolic content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC) of SBCG extracts. The TPC and TFC in the three extracts were in a range of 72.5 ± 5.1 mg to 609.6 ± 10.1 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g dried extract and 7.6 ± 0.6 mg to 19 ± 0.6 mg quercetin equivalents (QE)/g dried extract, respectively, with the highest content found in the acetone (ACE) extract followed by the methanol (MeOH) and petroleum ether (PE) extracts (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Extraction yield, TPC, and TFC of SBCG extracts

Antioxidant activity

Antioxidant potency was tested for DPPH radical scavenging activity, superoxide radical scavenging (SORS) activity, and reducing power, with results shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3. Irrespective of the extracts, DPPH radical scavenging activity was found to be concentration dependent (Figure 1) with highest activity in the ACE extract followed by the MeOH and PE extracts. Table 2 shows the IC50 values for the positive control (ascorbic acid) and the three extracts, with a lower IC50 indicating greater scavenging power. No significant difference was found between the DPPH IC50 values of the ACE and MeOH extracts of SBCG and the positive control. Figure 2 shows SORS activity of SBCG extract and ascorbic acid. The SORS activity was dose dependent. SORS data for the PE extract were not recorded due to precipitation. The ACE extract possessed higher SORS activity than the MeOH extract. The IC50 values of these two SBCG extracts were significantly lower than that of the control antioxidant (ascorbic acid) (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The reducing power activity was also dose dependent (Figure 3) with the highest activity found in ascorbic acid. Reducing power of the PE extract was also not recorded because of precipitation, and the ACE extract exhibited higher reducing power than the MeOH extract.

Figure 1
figure 1

Antioxidant activity of the PE, ACE, and MeOH extracts of SBCG and ascorbic acid (positive control) assessed by the DPPH radical scavenging method. Each value represents the mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 2
figure 2

Antioxidant activity of the ACE and MeOH extracts of SBCG and ascorbic acid (positive control) assessed by the superoxide oxide radical scavenging method. Each value represents the mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 3
figure 3

Antioxidant activity of the ACE and MeOH extracts of SBCG and ascorbic acid (positive control) assessed by the reducing power method. Each value represents the mean ± SD of three determinations.

Table 2 IC50 values of different antioxidant assays of SBCG extracts

Antibacterial activity

Table 3 shows the inhibition zone diameter of six bacterial pathogens due to the application of two reference antibiotics (neomycin and penicillin) and the three extracts at concentrations of 4 μg/disc and 1000 μg/disc, respectively. The ACE extract produced the largest diameter of inhibition zone (10.8-15.6 mm). Figure 4 shows the inhibition zone of one test organism, Klebsiella pneumoniae, towards a graded dose of ACE extract. The negative control showed no inhibition zone (data not shown). The minimum inhibitory dose (MID) of the ACE and MeOH extracts for the three sensitive pathogens were found to be in the range of 31.2-62.5 μg/disc and 125 μg/disc, respectively (Table 4). The PE extract inhibited only Klebsiella pneumoniae and the MID was 500 μg/disc.

Table 3 Antibacterial activity of different SBCG extracts
Figure 4
figure 4

Appearance of the inhibition zones of Klebsiella pneumoniae as a result of application of graded doses (7.8-500 μg/disc) of the ACE extract of SBCG.

Table 4 MIDs of different positive SBCG extracts

Effects of different extracts on the proliferation of HeLa cells

Figure 5 shows the percentage of viable HeLa cells after treatment with the three SBCG extracts. The relative number of surviving cells decreased in a dose-dependent manner, although there was no significant difference observed between the four lowest concentrations in PE, three lowest concentrations and two highest concentrations in the ACE extract, and four lowest concentrations in MeOH extract. Treatment with the ACE extract produced the greatest concentration-dependent response. For example, ACE extract at 5-80 μg/ml decreased the proliferation of HeLa cells by 95% to 35%. On the other hand, 5-80 μg/ml of either the MeOH or PE extract decreased the viable cells by 96% to 43% and 101% to 75%, respectively. Correspondingly, the IC50 value of the ACE extract (35.5 ± 0.6 μg/ml) was found to be the lowest compared with the MeOH extract (75.01 ± 3.4 μg/ml) and PE extract (156.07 ± 5.7 μg/ml) (P < 0.05). The positive control (curcumin) was found to have an IC50 value of 6.8 ± 1.4 μg/ml (data not shown).

Figure 5
figure 5

Cytotoxic effect of the PE, ACE, and MeOH extracts of SBCG against HeLa cells. Cell survival was determined as the percentage of the control from three independent experiments. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Bars marked without a common letter within each extract are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Effects of different extracts on inducing apoptosis of HeLa cells

Figure 6 shows the appearance of stained HeLa cells under fluorescence microscopy after treatment with the three extracts. The density of HeLa cells, emitting green fluorescence, was lowest due to treatment with the ACE extract, followed by that due to treatment with the MeOH and PE extracts. In other words, there were more dead cells (showing red fluorescence due to AO stain) in the ACE extract treatment group than in the MeOH and PE extract treatment groups. Characteristic features of apoptotic cells, such as cytoplasmic membrane blebbing, nuclear contraction, nuclear fragmentation, and contact inhibition, were visible at 24 h after treatment with the extracts. These features were more prominent in the cells treated with the ACE and MeOH extracts compared with the other treatments (Figure 6C-D). Figure 7 shows results of a DNA fragmentation assay on HeLa cells. DNA fragmentation of extract-treated HeLa cells was comparable with that of cells treated with curcumin, the positive control. Due to a technical reason, a 100-kb ladder marker was used although a 1-kb ladder would have been ideal. Table 5 shows results of the flow cytometry analysis. The sub-G0/G1 population (of HeLa cells) as a biochemical marker of apoptosis was considerably higher in all the extract-treated groups compared with the untreated control. The ACE extract resulted in the highest population of 46.3 ± 3.6% in (P < 0.05) followed by the MeOH extract (35.2 ± 4.4%) (P < 0.05) and then the PE extract (9.1 ± 0.8%). The population of cells in other phases (G1, S, and G2) of the cell cycle were lower, irrespective of the extract (data not shown).

Figure 6
figure 6

HeLa cells stained with AO/EB and viewed under fluorescence microscope (400×) showing apoptosis. (A) Healthy control cells; (B, C and D) Treatment with the PE, ACE, and MeOH extracts (80 μg/ml) on HeLa cells showing membrane blebbing (black arrow), nuclear condensation (blue arrow), budding to form apoptotic body (purple arrow), nuclear fragmentation (white arrow).

Figure 7
figure 7

Gel electrophoresis image obtained after DNA fragmentation assay for apoptosis detection. The lanes PC, NC, PE, ACE, MeOH, and M represent treatment with the positive control (curcumin), negative control (no treatment), petroleum ether extract, acetone extract, methanol extract (IC50), and marker (100 bp DNA ladder), respectively.

Table 5 Effect of SBCG extracts (80 μg/ml) on sub-G0/G1 in HeLa cells

Correlation analysis

As shown in Table 6 we observed a statistically significant correlation between total phenolic and flavonoid content of the three SBCG extracts and their corresponding DPPH IC50, MTT IC50, and sub-G0/G1 population (P < 0.05).

Table 6 Simple correlations (r value) between TPC and TFC in the SBCG extracts and their DPPH IC50 and MTT IC50 values and sub-G0/G1 population

Discussion

This is the first report on the total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, and apoptotic activities of stem bark extracts of C. griffithii. The total content of phenolic and flavonoid was highest in the ACE extract followed by the MeOH and PE extracts. Earlier studies reported the occurrence of various flavonoids in other species of Cephalotaxus[2, 7, 8]. Polyphenols and flavonoids of several medicinal plants including Cephalotaxus spp. are known to exhibit multiple biological effects [2–4, 9–11]. Therefore, we investigated the polyphenol and flavonoid enriched SBCG extracts for their various biological activities.

The tested extracts and positive control showed antioxidant activity in a dose-dependent manner. Antioxidant activity varied among the extracts and controls. The highest antioxidant activity was observed in the positive control, and among the three extracts the ACE extract showed the highest antioxidant activity followed by the MeOH and PE extracts. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the DPPH IC50 values among the ACE and MeOH extracts and the positive control. In contrast, the IC50 value of SORS activity was significantly (Table 2; P < 0.05) lower in both the ACE and MeOH extracts compared with the positive control. In several studies, direct relationships have been observed between total phenolic/flavonoid content and plants' antioxidant activity [12–14]. Many studies also showed potential of purified polyphenols in reducing oxidative stress induced by many factors [15–17]. Bae et al. [4] isolated five flavonoids from C. koreana, of which four possessed high levels of antioxidant activity based on DPPH radical scavenging and superoxide radical scavenging assays. In agreement with those reports we observed here a statistically significant correlation between phenolic (r = 0.936, P < 0.05)/flavonoid (r = 0.742, P < 0.05) content and the IC50 value of DPPH. This result suggests the presence of potential polyphenols and flavonoids as antioxidants in the SBCG extracts. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing polyphenol components is due to their capacity to be donors of hydrogen atoms or electrons and to capture free radicals [18].

The SBCG extracts exhibited differential bacterial inhibitory effects and both the ACE and MeOH extracts inhibited only three pathogens, namely Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus, out of the six organisms tested. The PE extract inhibited only one strain, Klebsiella pneumoniae. The ACE extract was the most effective among the extracts as it produced a thicker inhibition zone (10.8-15.6 mm) and smaller MID (31.2-62.5 μg/disc) compared with that produced by the other extracts. Polyphenols are well documented for their antibacterial activities [19, 20]. This underscores the importance of the ACE extract of SBCG which showed the highest antibacterial activity and contained the highest amount of polyphenols and flavonoids among the extracts tested. This inhibition of microorganisms by phenolic compounds may be due to iron deprivation or hydrogen bonding with vital proteins such as microbial enzymes or other interactions to inactivate microbial adhesins, cell envelope transport proteins, and/or non-specific interactions with carbohydrates, among other possible effects [19, 20]. Earlier, Cho et al. [21] reported an inhibitory effect of Korean plum yew (C. koreana) extract on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and molds. Similarly, Watanabe and Fukao [22] reported that an extract of unripe Japanese plum yew fruit (C. harringtonia) possessed, among 101 edible plants, the highest inhibitory effect against Bacillus cereus and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Our results on the antimicrobial effect of SBCG and those of Korean and Japanese plum yew confirm the antibacterial potential of plants in the Cephalotaxus genus.

Another important aspect of this study is the observed cytotoxicity of three solvent SBCG extracts on HeLa cells and the apoptotic activity of the extracts. Results of an MTT assay with SBCG indicated that the ACE extract was most effective in inducing cytotoxicity of HeLa cells. This was evident from the lowest IC50 (35.5 ± 0.6 μg/ml) of the ACE extract among the three extracts. In a previous study, a methylated biflavone, taiwanhomoflavone-A, isolated from C. wilsoniana, was found to possess high antiproliferative activity on KB epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx, COLO-205 colon carcinoma, Hepa-3B hepatoma, and HeLa cervix tumor cells [2], with ED50 values of 3.4, 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 μg/ml, respectively. Similarly, two biflavonoids, namely ginkgetin and 4', 7″-Di-O-methyl-amentoflavone, from C. koreana were reported to show cytotoxicity against mouse osteoblasts [3]. There are 1100 publications reporting anticancer activities of polyphenols in the peer-reviewed journals [23] indicating that polyphenols are the main phytochemicals of higher plants possessing antiproliferative properties. We observed a statistically significant correlation between TPC (r = 0.995, P < 0.05)/TFC (r = 0.915, P < 0.05) and MTT IC50, which explains the association of the high cytotoxic activity with polyphenol/flavonoid content in the SBCG. It is of interest to design future experiments to identify pure polyphenol/flavonoid molecules in SBCG with anticancer activities. To ascertain whether the cytotoxicity against HeLa cells was mediated through apoptosis, morphological, biochemical, and sub-G0/G1 population studies were carried out on treated HeLa cells. In the morphological study, most of the dead cells showed characteristic features of apoptosis such as cytoplasmic membrane blebbing, nuclear contraction, nuclear fragmentation, and contact inhibition (Figure 6) due to treatment with the extracts. These features were very prominent in the ACE and MeOH extracts. Biochemically, apoptosis is characterized by activation of endogenous nucleases and DNA degradation into fragment multiples of 185 bp [24] which we observed in the DNA fragmentation assay (Figure 7). Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis of treated HeLa cells also showed that the sub-G0/G1 population, a biochemical marker of apoptosis [25] with hypo-diploid DNA, was significantly higher due to treatment with the ACE extract (46.3 ± 3.6%) than with the MeOH extract (35.2 ± 4.4%) compared with control (P < 0.05). This accumulation directly relates to decreases of the cell populations in other phases of the cell cycle, indicating cell death through interference of the cell program. Previous studies showed that polyphenolic compounds induce apoptosis [26, 27]. Our study also showed that an increase in the total phenol/flavonoid content of the SBCG extracts significantly increased the rate of apoptosis as evident from the highly significant correlation of TPC/TFC with the sub-G0/G1 population (Table 6). Polyphenolic compounds induce apoptosis in cancer cells by increasing caspase activity [26, 28]; upregulating the expression of p53, Bax, Bak, and Bim; and downregulating the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL [28].

Conclusions

Based on our results, we conclude that SBCG extracts contain bioactive components responsible for antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, and apoptotic activities. The polyphenol and flavonoid content of SBCG appears to be responsible for these biological activities. Among the extracts, the ACE extract was found to contain the highest amount of polyphenols and flavonoids and consequently exhibited the highest level of biological activity. We are currently separating and characterizing the bioactive components of the ACE extract of SBCG to test for potential applications in the human health sector.

Methods

Chemicals

Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) reagent; gallic acid; 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH); nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT); 3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT); acridine orange (AO); propidium iodide (PI); and cell culture chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Ascorbic acid, curcumin, neomycin sulphate, penicillin, and riboflavin were purchased from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Proteinase-K, RNase, and ethidium bromide (EB) were purchased from Bangalore Genei (Bangalore, India). Quercetin was purchased from Ozone International, and the rest of the chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade.

Plant material

The SBCG was collected from Kangchup Hills, Manipur, India (N24°52'10″ E093°46'12″) at an elevation of 1534.668 m above sea level. The specimen was identified by Dr Biseshori Thongam, Plant Bioresources Division, Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Manipur, India and by Dr S.K. Verma, National Bureau of Plant Genetics Resources, Meghalaya, India. A voucher specimen (IBSD/C/102) has been deposited to the IBSD herbarium.

Preparation of SBCG extract

The SBCG was air dried at room temperature and powdered. The powdered bark (100 g) was then exhaustively extracted serially by soaking (which prevents the loss of biological activity of some heat-sensitive ingredients) in PE, ACE, and MeOH in order to fractionate the phytochemical constituents into fractions or extracts. Filtration was performed and the filtrates were concentrated in vacuo using a vacuum rotary evaporator (EYELA, Japan) and finally freeze dried (Thermo, Modulyod). The dried extracts were kept at 4°C until further analysis.

Test sample preparation

Solutions of the test samples for the entire study of the PE extract were prepared in 1, 4-dioxan, except for the antibacterial study in which the sample was prepared in petroleum ether. The ACE and MeOH extracts test sample solutions used in the different experiments were prepared in DMSO. Reagent solutions were made in distilled water, unless otherwise specified.

Determination of total phenolic content

The TPC was determined using the FC reagent, following the procedure devised by Singleton and Rossi [29], with some modification. Briefly, 20 μl extract (500 μg/ml) was mixed with 1.58 ml distilled water. To this mixture, 100 μl of FC reagent (1:2 dilutions) was added, followed by further addition of 300 μl sodium carbonate (1.8 M). This was incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance was then read at 765 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-1700 Pharmaspec, Shimadzu). The TPC was expressed as GAE in milligrams per gram extract after making a standard graph with five different concentrations of gallic acid (50-500 mg/l).

Determination of total flavonoid content

The TFC of SBCG extracts was determined by the method described by Woisky and Salatino [30]. To 0.5 ml of each extract (1 mg/ml), 0.5 ml of 0.14 M aluminum chloride ethanol solution was added. After 1 h at room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 420 nm. The TFC was expressed as QE in milligrams per gram extract after making a standard graph with five different concentrations of quercetin (12.5-200 μg/ml).

Scavenging activity of DPPH radical

The free radical scavenging activity of the crude extracts was evaluated as described by Mensor et al. [31]. A solution of DPPH (0.3 mM) in ethanol was prepared and 1 ml added to different concentrations (5-100 μg/ml) of extract samples. After 30 min incubation at room temperature in the dark, absorbance values were measured at 517 nm in a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Ascorbic acid at different concentrations (2-20 μg/ml) was used as positive controls. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated as follows:

% inhibition = [ ( Absorbance of control - Absorbance of test sample ) / Absorbance of control ] × 100 .

Superoxide radical scavenging activity

Measurement of SORS activity was carried out as described by Duan et al. [32], with a slight modification. Various concentrations (5-100 μg/ml) of test samples were mixed with 200 μl EDTA (0.1 M), 100 μl riboflavin (0.5 mM), 200 μl ethanol, and 100 μl NBT (1.2 mM) and the mixture was diluted to 3 ml with phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). The absorbance was then read at 560 nm after illumination for 15 minutes. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated as follows:

% inhibition = [ ( Absorbance of control - Absorbance of test sample ) / Absorbance of control ] × 100 .

Reducing power

The reducing power was carried out as described by Oyaizu [33]. Various concentrations (5-100 μg/ml) of test samples were mixed with 2.5 ml phosphate buffer (0.2 M; pH = 6.6) and 2.5 ml potassium ferricyanide (0.03 M). After the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min, 2.5 ml of trichloroacetic acid (0.6 M) was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 1811 g for 10 min. Supernatant (2.5 ml) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 ml) and 0.5 ml of ferric chloride (6.1 mM). The absorbance was then read at 700 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control.

Bacterial strains

The following bacterial strains, procured from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India, were used in the screening: Bacillus subtilis (MTCC2451), Bacillus cereus (MTCC430), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC2581). Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus were obtained from Dehradun Medical College, Dehradun, India.

Preparation of discs

Whatman filter paper (no.1) discs (5 mm diameter) were impregnated with 20 μl of crude extracts to get a concentration of 1000 μg/disc and were kept at 37°C for 24 h. The reference antibiotics (neomycin and penicillin) were prepared at appropriate concentrations (4 μg/disc) to serve as the positive controls and solvents PE, ACE, and MeOH as the negative controls.

Agar disc diffusion method

A modified agar diffusion method was used to determine antibacterial activity [34]. The bacterial cells suspension, 1 × 106 cfu/ml, was mixed with sterile nutrient agar and poured into petri dishes to give a solid plate.

The discs were deposited on the surface of inoculated agar plates. The bacterial plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Inhibition zone diameters around each of the discs (diameter of inhibition zone plus diameter of the disc) were measured and recorded at the end of the incubation time. An average zone of inhibition was calculated for three replicates.

Minimum inhibitory doses

MID was determined by the disc diffusion method. Discs with graded doses (7.8-500 μg/disc) of extracts were prepared, with each consecutive disc containing double the amount of extract prior to when the agar disc diffusion test was performed. MIDs were also determined for positive control. The MID is the lowest quantity of the sample required to inhibit any visible growth.

Cell culture

The human cervical adenocarcinoma cell line (HeLa) was obtained from the National Centre for Cell Science (Pune, India). These were grown as monolayer cultures in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic antimycotic solution (1000 U/ml penicillin, 10 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 5 mg/ml gentamycin, and 25 μg/ml amphotericin-B), and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air with 90% relative humidity.

MTT reduction assay on HeLa cells

Cytotoxicity analysis was determined using the MTT assay as reported by Mosmann [35]. HeLa cells grown in T-25 culture flasks were harvested by trypsinization, plated at an approximate density of 1 × 105 cells/well in 96-well culture plates (Corning, Sigma), and incubated for 24 h to achieve confluency. Next the medium from each well was removed and the cells washed twice with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were then exposed to increasing concentrations of extract (5-80 μg/ml). Each well contained 100 μl of serum-free DMEM containing different concentrations of extracts. The cells were then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air with 90% relative humidity for 24 h. After incubation, the contents were replaced with equal amounts of MTT dissolved in serum-free DMEM (1.2 mM) after which the plates were further incubated for 3 h. The contents were then replaced with equal amounts of DMSO to solubilize the formazan grains formed by viable cells. Finally, the absorbance was read at 570 nm using a multi-well plate reader (Tecan, Infinite M200). The viability percentage was calculated by using the formula below:

Viability % = Absorbance of test sample × 100 / Absorbance of solvent control .

Fluorescence microscopy

Differential staining of extract-treated (80 μg/ml; 24 h) and untreated HeLa cells was done using DNA-intercalate fluorescent dyes EB and AO [36], and analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, TS 100-F; Tokyo, Japan).

DNA fragmentation assay

For laddering experiments, HeLa cells (2 × 106 cells/well) were cultured in 6-well culture plates (Corning, Sigma), treated with extracts (MTT test IC50 value) and incubated for 48 h in a CO2 incubator. Treated cells were then harvested, washed with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.2), and centrifuged at 0.8 g for 6 min at 4°C. The resulting cell pellet was dispersed in 30 μl of lysis buffer (10 mM EDTA; 50 mM Tris HCl, pH-7.8; 1% SDS) by gentle vortexing. About 4 μl of proteinase-K (10 μg/μl) was then added to the above mixture, followed by incubation at 45°C for 1-2 h. Then, 2 μl of RNase (10 μg/μl) was added to the cell lysates, which were further incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation cell lysates were mixed with 4 μl of 6X DNA sample dye and subjected to run at 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The gel was then stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml) and visualized under a gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, USA).

Flow cytometry

Apoptotic cells were detected using PI staining [37] of HeLa cells followed by flow cytometry to detect the sub-G0/G1 cell population [38]. Briefly, HeLa cells were treated with or without SBCG extract (80 μg/ml) for 24 h. After treatment, floating and adherent cells were harvested and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol overnight at -20°C. Fixed cells were then treated with 0.5 ml of DNA extraction buffer (192 ml of 0.2 M Na2HPO4 with 8 ml of 0.1% Triton X-100 (v/v)) for 5 min at room temperature. DNA was stained with PI (0.02 mM) and incubated for 1 h in the dark. Flow cytometric analysis was then performed using a flow cytometer (BD FACSCaliber). At least 10,000 cells were analyzed for each sample and data were analyzed and plotted by CellQuest software.

Statistical analysis

The values are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation) of triplicate measurements. Multiple comparisons between more than two groups were performed by one-way ANOVA supplemented with Tukey's HSD post hoc test. Values at P < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Simple correlation analysis was carried out and significance tested by following standard methods [39].

References

  1. Uma S: Blooming potential of the detached shoots of Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook. f. Curr Sci. 2008, 95: 320-321.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuo Y-H, Lin C-H, Hwang S-Y, Shen Y-C, Lee Y-C, Li S-Y: Novel cytotoxic C-methylated biflavone from the stem of Cephalotaxus wilsoniana. Chem Pharm Bull. 2000, 48: 440-441. 10.1248/cpb.48.440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee MK, Lin SW, Yang H, Sung HS, Lee H-S, Park MJ, Kim YC: Osteoblast differentiation stimulating activity of biflavonoids from Cephalotaxus koreana. Bioorg Medicinal Chem Lett. 2006, 16: 2850-2854. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.03.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bae K, Jin W, Thoung PT, Min BS, Na M, Lee YM, Kang SS: A new flavonoid glycoside from the leaf of Cephalotaxus koreana. Fitoterapia. 2007, 78: 409-413. 10.1016/j.fitote.2007.02.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamil M, Khan NA, Ahmad I, Iiyas M, Rahman W: Chemical constituents of Cephalotaxus griffithii. J Indian Chem Soc. 1982, 59: 1199-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Phutdhawong W, Korth J, Budhasukh D, Pyne SG: Volatile components from Cephalotaxus griffithii growing in northern Thailand. Flavour Fragr J. 2002, 17: 153-155. 10.1002/ffj.1064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Plouvier V: Cephalotaxoside, a new apigenin heteroside isolated from Cephalotaxus. Presence of rhoifolin in Exochorda and Lupinus. C.r.Acad.sci, Ser.D: Sciences Naturelles. 1966, 263: 1529-1532.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L-W, Su H-J, Yang S-Z, Won S-J, Lin C-N: New alkaloids and a tetraflavonoid from Cephalotaxus wilsoniana. J Nat Prod. 2004, 67: 1182-1185. 10.1021/np0498657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gamet-Payrastre L, Manenti S, Gratacap MP, Tulliez J, Chap H, Payrastre B: Flavonoids and the inhibition of PKC and PI 3-kinase. Gen Pharmacol. 1999, 32: 279-286. 10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00220-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Middleton E, Kandaswami C, Theoharides TC: The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease and cancer. Pharmacol Rev. 2000, 52: 673-751.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nichols JA, Katiyar SK: Skin photoprotection by natural polyphenols: anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and DNA repair mechanisms. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010, 302: 71-83. 10.1007/s00403-009-1001-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan YV, Walsh NA: Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of extracts from a variety of edible seaweeds. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006, 44: 1144-1150. 10.1016/j.fct.2006.02.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao ASVC, Reddy SG, Babu PP, Reddy AR: The antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of methanolic extracts from Njavara rice bran. BMC Complem Altern Med. 2010, 10: 4-10.1186/1472-6882-10-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho M, Ferreira PJ, Mendes VS, Silva R, Pereira JA, Jerónimo C, Silva BM: Human cancer cell antiproliferative and antioxidant activities of Juglans regia L. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010, 48: 441-447. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.10.043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kook D, Wolf AH, Yu AL, Neubauer AS, Priglinger SG, Kampik A, Welge-Lüssen UC: The protective effect of quercetin against oxidative stress in the human RPE in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008, 49: 1712-1720. 10.1167/iovs.07-0477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nabavi SF, Eslami S, Moghaddam AH, Nabavi SM: Protective effects of curcumin against fluoride-induced oxidative stress in the rat brain. Neurophysiology. 2011, 43: 287-291. 10.1007/s11062-011-9228-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nabavi SF, Moghaddam AH, Eslami S, Nabavi SM: Protective effects of curcumin against sodium fluoride-induced toxicity in rat kidneys. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012, 145: 369-374. 10.1007/s12011-011-9194-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shon M-Y, Kim T-H, Sung N-J: Antioxidants and free radical scavenging activity of Phellinus baumii (Phellinus of Hymenochaetoceae) extracts. Food Chem. 2003, 82: 593-597. 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00015-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scalbert A: Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 1991, 30: 3875-3883. 10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-L.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cowan MM: Plants products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 564-582.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho CH, Yoo G, Kim S, Lee G-S, Kim J-H, Hyun J-O, Chae HJ: Antimicrobial activity and cell cytotoxicity of Korean Plum-yem extract. J Appl Biol Chem. 2009, 52: 45-50. 10.3839/jabc.2009.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe K, Fukao T: Antibacterial effects of unripe Cephalotaxus harringtonia fruit extract on gram-positive bacteria. J Jpn Soc Food Sci Technol. 2009, 56: 533-540. 10.3136/nskkk.56.533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamoral-Theys D, Pottier L, Dufrasne F, Nève J, Dubois J, Kornienko A, Kiss R, Ingrassia L: Natural polyphenols that display anticancer properties through inhibition of kinase activity. Curr Med Chem. 2010, 17: 812-825. 10.2174/092986710790712183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bortner CD, Oldenburg NBE, Cidlowski JA: The role of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 1995, 5: 21-26. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)88932-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu J, Liu H, Lei J, Tan W, Hu X, Zou G: Antitumor activity of chloroform fraction of Scutellaria barbata and its active constituents. Phytother Res. 2007, 21: 817-822. 10.1002/ptr.2062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolter F, Akoglu B, Clausnitzer A, Stein J: Downregulation of the cyclin D1/Cdk4 complex occurs during resveratrol-induced cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cell lines. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 2197-2203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shankar S, Srivastava RK: Involvement of Bcl-2 family members, phosphatidylinositol 3'- kinase/AKT and mitochondrial p53 in curcumin (diferulolylmethane)-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer. Int J Oncol. 2007, 30: 905-918.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YA, Lee WH, Choi TH, Rhee SH, Park KY, Choi YH: Involvement of p21WAF1/CIP1, pRB, Bax and NF-kappaB in induction of growth arrest and apoptosis by resveratrol in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Int J Oncol. 2003, 23: 1143-1149.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singleton VL, Rossi JA: Colorometry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Amer J Enol Viticult. 1965, 16: 144-158.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Woisky RG, Salatino A: Analysis of propolis: Some parameters and procedures for chemical quality control. J Apicult Res. 1998, 37: 99-105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mensor LL, Menezes FS, Leitao GG, Reis AS, Santos TC, Coube CS, Leitao SG: Screening of Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method. Phytother Res. 2001, 15: 127-130. 10.1002/ptr.687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan X, Wu G, Jiang Y: Evaluation of anti oxidant properties of phenolics from lichi fruit in relation to pericarp browning prevention. Molecules. 2007, 12: 759-771. 10.3390/12040759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oyaizu M: Studies on products of the browning reaction. Antioxidative activities of browning reaction products prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr. 1986, 44: 307-314. 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966, 45: 493-496.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65: 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel S, Kasoju N, Bora U, Goyal A: Structural analysis and biomedical applications of dextran produced by a new isolate Pediococcus pentosaceus screened from biodiversity hot spot Assam. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101: 6852-6855. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Riccardi C, Nicoletti I: Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 1458-1461. 10.1038/nprot.2006.238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fuke H, Shiraki K, Sugimoto K, Tanaka J, Beppu T, Yoneda K, Yamamoto N, Ito K, Masuya M, Takei Y: Jak inhibitor induces S phase cell-cycle arrest and augments TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 363: 738-744. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kwanchai AG, Arturo AG: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 1984, Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, Inc

    Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding

The senior author thanks the Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal and Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for the PhD-JRF fellowship. The technical help of Mr Lokesh Deb, Dr Reena Langoljam, and Miss Surbala Laishram of IBSD and Mr Arghya Sett of IIT, Guwahati is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narayan Chandra Talukdar.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

DSM: performed the entire experiment and prepared the manuscript. NCT: designed the research plan; supervised and coordinated the study; and corrected the manuscript. NK and UB: assisted, along with DSM, in conducting the cell culture-based experiment. All authors have duly checked and approved the manuscript before submission.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moirangthem, D.S., Talukdar, N.C., Kasoju, N. et al. Antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, and apoptotic activity of stem bark extracts of Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook. f. BMC Complement Altern Med 12, 30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-30

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-30

Keywords