Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanna Zick |
22 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jun Mao |
2 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jun Mao |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanna Zick |
27 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
31 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
31 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
25 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-11-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.