BMC Women's Health Volume 8
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articlePreliminary development of a scale to measure stigma relating to sexually transmitted infections among women in a high risk neighbourhoodMelanie LA Rusch1 , Jean A Shoveller2 , Susan Burgess3 , Karen Stancer4 , David M Patrick2,5 and Mark W Tyndall6,7  1Division of International Health and Cross Cultural Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA 2Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 3Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 4Downtown Community Health Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada 5British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada 6British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada 7Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada author email corresponding author email
BMC Women's Health 2008,
8:21doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-21
|
|
| Published: |
20 November 2008 |
Abstract
Background
As stigma is a socially constructed concept, it would follow that stigma related to sexual behaviours and sexually transmitted infections would carry with it many of the gender-based morals that are entrenched in social constructs of sexuality. In many societies, women tend to be judged more harshly with respect to sexual morals, and would therefore have a different experience of stigma related to sexual behaviours as compared to men. While a variety of stigma scales exist for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in general; none incorporate these female-specific aspects. The objective of this study was to develop a scale to measure the unique experience of STI-related stigma among women.
Methods
A pool of items was identified from qualitative and quantitative literature on sexual behaviour and STIs among women. Women attending a social evening program at a local community health clinic in a low-income neighbourhood with high prevalence of substance use were passively recruited to take part in a cross-sectional structured interview, including questions on sexual behaviour, sexual health and STI-related stigma. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify stigma scales, and descriptive statistics were used to assess the associations of demographics, sexual and drug-related risk behaviours with the emerging scales.
Results
Three scales emerged from exploratory factor analysis – female-specific moral stigma, social stigma (judgement by others) and internal stigma (self-judgement) – with alpha co-efficients of 0.737, 0.705 and 0.729, respectively. In this population of women, internal stigma and social stigma carried higher scores than female-specific moral stigma. Aboriginal ethnicity was associated with higher internal and female-specific moral stigma scores, while older age (>30 years) was associated with higher female-specific moral stigma scores.
Conclusion
Descriptive statistics indicated an important influence of culture and age on specific types of stigma. Quantitative researchers examining STI-stigma should consider incorporating these female-specific factors in order to tailor scales for women. |