Peer Review reports
From: Disparities exist between National food group recommendations and the dietary intakes of women
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Malcolm Riley |
| 7 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wendy Oddy |
| 20 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michelle Blumfield |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Malcolm Riley |
| 22 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michelle Blumfield |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michelle Blumfield |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michelle Blumfield |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-37 |
You can find further information about peer review here.