Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Schmidt |
14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Scott Sills |
21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Frith |
10 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Frith |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lone Schmidt |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Scott Sills |
29 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucy Frith |
18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzana Zachia |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
31 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
31 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.