BMC Women's Health

unofficial impact factor 1.28

Open Access Highly Access Research article

Compliance and treatment satisfaction of post menopausal women treated for osteoporosis. Compliance with osteoporosis treatment

Dominique Huas1, Françoise Debiais2, Francis Blotman3, Bernard Cortet4, Florence Mercier5, Chantal Rousseaux6, Véronique Berger6, Anne-Françoise Gaudin7 and François-Emery Cotté7,8*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of General Practice, UFR Paris 7, Paris, France

2 Rheumatology Department, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France

3 Rheumatology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France

4 Rheumatology Department, Roger Salengro Hospital, Lille, France

5 STAT-Process, Port-Mort, France

6 Nukléus, Paris, France

7 Laboratoire GlaxoSmithKline, Marly le Roi, France

8 CERMES, IFR69, INSERM U750, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Villejuif, France

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Women's Health 2010, 10:26 doi:10.1186/1472-6874-10-26

Published: 20 August 2010

Abstract

Background

Adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatments is poor, exposing treated women to increased fracture risk. Determinants of poor adherence are poorly understood. The study aims to determine physician- and patient- rated treatment compliance with osteoporosis treatments and to evaluate factors influencing compliance.

Methods

This was an observational, cross-sectional pharmacoepidemiological study with a randomly-selected sample of 420 GPs, 154 rheumatologists and 110 gynaecologists practicing in France. Investigators included post-menopausal women with a diagnosis of osteoporosis and a treatment initiated in the previous six months. Investigators completed a questionnaire on clinical features, treatments and medical history, and on patient compliance. Patients completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic features, lifestyle, attitudes and knowledge about osteoporosis, treatment compliance, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Treatment compliance was evaluated with the Morisky Medication-taking Adherence Scale. Variables collected in the questionnaires were evaluated for association with compliance using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

785 women were evaluated. Physicians considered 95.4% of the sample to be compliant, but only 65.5% of women considered themselves compliant. The correlation between patient and physician perceptions of compliance was low (κ: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.06 to 0.16]). Patient-rated compliance was highest for monthly bisphosphonates (79.7%) and lowest for hormone substitution therapy (50.0%). Six variables were associated with compliance: treatment administration frequency, perceptions of long-term treatment acceptability, perceptions of health consequences of osteoporosis, perceptions of knowledge about osteoporosis, exercise and mental quality of life.

Conclusion

Compliance to anti-osteoporosis treatments is poor. Reduction of dosing regimen frequency and patient education may be useful ways of improving compliance.