How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews

Viewing options:

Associated material:

Related literature:

Tools:

Post to:

Research article

Bee Wee¹^,2 , Gina Hadley³^* and Sheena Derry³^*

¹Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK

²Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TD, UK

³Pain Research, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

BMC Palliative Care 2008, 7:13doi:10.1186/1472-684X-7-13


Published:	20 August 2008

Additional file 1:

Included reviews. Details of included reviews.

Format: PDF Size: 59KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Additional file 2:

Adequacy of included studies. Details of design, size, and quality of primary studies in each review.

Format: PDF Size: 43KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Additional file 3:

Quality and validity tools. Details of tools used to assess quality and validity in primary studies.

Format: PDF Size: 25KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader