BMC Palliative Care Volume 1
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 DebateQuality end-of-life care: A global perspectivePeter A Singer 1,2,3 and Kerry W Bowman 1,4,5  1University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada author email corresponding author email
BMC Palliative Care 2002,
1:4doi:10.1186/1472-684X-1-4 Abstract
Background
Quality end-of-life care has emerged as an important concept in industrialized countries.
Discussion
We argue quality end-of-life care should be seen as a global public health and health systems problem. It is a global problem because 85 % of the 56 million deaths worldwide that occur annually are in developing countries. It is a public health problem because of the number of people it affects, directly and indirectly, in terms of the well being of loved ones, and the large-scale, population based nature of some possible interventions. It is a health systems problem because one of its main features is the need for better information on quality end-of-life care. We examine the context of end-of-life care, including the epidemiology of death and cross-cultural considerations. Although there are examples of success, we could not identify systematic data on capacity for delivering quality end-of-life care in developing countries. We also address a possible objection to improving end-of-life care in developing countries; many deaths are preventable and reduction of avoidable deaths should be the focus of attention.
Conclusions
We make three recommendations: (1) reinforce the recasting of quality end-of-life care as a global public health and health systems problem; (2) strengthen capacity to deliver quality end-of-life care; and (3) develop improved strategies to acquire information about the quality of end-of-life care. |