Table 2 |
||||||
|
The effect of NaF immersion. |
||||||
|
Disks previously stored in medium I |
Disks previously stored in medium II |
Disks previously stored in medium III |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
wtF(%) |
SD |
wt F(%) |
SD |
wt F(%) |
SD |
|
|
|
||||||
|
FT |
15.7 |
0.37 |
15.5 |
0.31 |
15.5 |
0.20 |
|
FII |
7.8A,B.C |
0.25 |
8.5A,B |
0.36 |
8.25A,C |
0.27 |
|
FVIII |
12.1x,z |
0.37 |
12.5y,z |
0.37 |
10.5x,y,z |
0.37 |
|
FIX |
11.4X,Z |
0.37 |
11.8Y,Z |
0.37 |
10.5X,Y,Z |
0.37 |
|
KN |
8.2 |
0.69 |
8.2 |
0.52 |
8 |
0.70 |
|
HSF |
2.5 |
0.44 |
2.67 |
0.52 |
2.75 |
0.72 |
|
|
||||||
|
The F concentrations (wt%); n = 2 disks; SD; same superscripts indicate average values with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). |
||||||
|
Markovic et al. BMC Oral Health 2008 8:21 doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-21 |
||||||
