Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Antibacterial effect of silver (I) carbohydrate complexes on oral pathogenic key species in vitro

BMC Oral Health volume 16, Article number: 42 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It was the aim of this study to evaluate the antibacterial impact of two silver(I) carbohydrate complexes with tripodal thioglycosides, namely tris[2-(β-D-thio-glucopyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (3) and tris[2-(α-D-thio-manno-pyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (4), on five oral pathogenic bacterial strains. Furthermore, cytocompatibility was tested using human gingival fibroblasts (HGF).

Methods

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined on five oral pathogenic bacterial strains by using the broth microdilution method: Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC 10953), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 33384), Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277), Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and Enterococcus faecalis (DSMZ 20376). Furthermore, antimicrobial efficiency was tested using agar diffusion assays. To evaluate cytocompatibility, human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) were exposed to AgNO3 and complex 3 followed by a live/dead staining.

Results

MIC of the silver(I) complexes ranged between 0.625 and 5.0 mmol/L. The silver complexes 3 and 4 showed higher antibacterial efficiency against all tested species than AgNO3. Antibacterial efficiency of complexes 3 and 4 on F. nucleatum (≥18 mm) and A. actinomycetemcomitans (≥23 mm) was more pronounced than against P. gingivalis (≥15 mm). Complex 3 (20 mM) induced the largest inhibition zones (30 to 31 mm) on Gram-negative strains. For Gram-positive strains, the largest inhibition zones were achieved by complex 3 (20 mM/S. mutans: 28 mm, E. faecalis: 18 mm). Complex 3 had a lower cytotoxic impact on HGFs compared to AgNO3 by the power of ten.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that silver(I) carbohydrate complexes 3 and 4 might function as novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of periodontal, carious or endodontic diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

The use of silver and silver complexes in medicine and dentistry has attracted much interest over the last decades although the beneficial antibacterial effect of this precious metal has been known since ancient times [1–3].

Numerous fields of application were described that benefit from the antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal efficiency of silver ions including the treatment of oral infectious diseases [4, 5]. These effects of silver ions are based mainly on three mechanisms of action: First, interaction of silver ions with the bacterial DNA; second, destruction of the cell membrane and third, blocking of essential enzymes causing disruption of electron transport [6, 7]. Therefore, the antimicrobial activity of silver(I) complexes strongly depends on the ligand-exchange ability of the complexes in order to release the coordinated silver(I) ions [8].

Inflammatory periodontal disease and dental caries are the two main reasons for tooth loss. Due to the infectious character of these widespread diseases, antibacterial agents play an important role in the treatment of periodontal and carious lesions [9–11]. In particular with regard to periodontal diseases, several in vitro studies have been published in the literature that describe the antibacterial efficiency of silver containing agents against periodontal species [12]. Also in restorative dentistry, suppression of pathogenic species is a significant step towards an effective therapy. For diagnostic purposes and treatment of caries and pulpitis [13], different silver-containing materials were described in the literature including dental adhesives and primers [14, 15], root canal sealers [16] and silver-loaded composite filling materials [17, 18].

Metal complexes substituted with carbohydrates are also increasingly studied for biomedical applications [19]. In 2006, silver(I) complexes based on tripodal thioglycosides were synthesized and analyzed in vitro by our group [20]. Despite the promising results, no clinical applications have been performed so far. One of the main advantages observed, besides their water solubility and stability in solution, was the higher cytocompatibility of the obtained complexes compared to their appropriate silver salts. Those silver complexes had significantly lower cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects [20]. It could also be shown that the tested silver(I) carbohydrate complexes had a broad antibacterial spectrum against different bacterial species. However, so far, these tests have not considered important oral pathogenic species that are associated with periodontal, carious and endodontic infections.

With this background, it was the aim of this study to determine the antimicrobial efficiency of two specific carbohydrate based silver(I) complexes, tris[2-(β-D-thio-glucopyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (3) and tris[2-(α-D-thio-manno-pyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (4), on oral pathogenic species. Additionally, we aimed to compare cytocompatibility of the silver(I) complexes and silver nitrate on human gingival fibroblasts.

Methods

Silver (I) complexes

The detailed description of the synthesis of the complexes was given earlier [20] and is schematically shown in Fig. 1. In brief, tris[2-(β-D-thio-glucopyranosyl-)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (3) was prepared by dissolving 277 mg (0.405 mmol) of the unprotected ligand (1) and 68.5 mg (0.405 mmol) AgNO3 in water (5 mL) and stirring the solution overnight. After filtration the solvent was evaporated. By diffusion of acetone into a aqueous solution of the raw product 310 mg (89 %) of colorless needles were obtained. 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O, DSS): 4.71 (d, 3H, H-1, J1,2 = 9.8 Hz), 3.31 (t, 3H, H-2, J2,3 = 9.3 Hz), 3.40 (t, 3H, H-3, J3,4 = 9.5 Hz), 3.47 - 3.52 (m, 6H, H-4, H-5), 3.96 (d, 3H, H-6, J6,6′ = 12.2 Hz), 3.72 (dd, 3H, H-6′, J5,6′ = 6.1 Hz), 3.25 (d, 3H, CH, J = 12.2 Hz), 3.06 (d, 3H, CH, J = 15.1 Hz), 2.84-2.99 (m, 3H, CH), 2.61 (d, 3H, CH, J = 13.7 Hz). 13C NMR (D2O, DSS): 88.88 (C1), 82.63 (C2), 79.51 (C3), 75.38 (C4), 71.85 (C5), 63.53 (C6), 53.30 (N-CH2-), 34.57 (S-CH2-). ESI-MS: m/z (%): 792.16 (100) (8)+, 630.09 (60) [M-C6H10O5]+, 468.03 (70) [M-2(C6H10O5)]+, 305.97 (95) [M-3(C6H10O5)]+. Anal. Calcd for C24H45AgN2O18S3: C, 33.77; H, 5.31; N, 3.28. Found: C, 32.90; H, 5.68; N, 3.07 %. Complex 4 was prepared analogous starting from the d-mannose derived ligand 2.

Bacterial strains

Five oral pathogenic bacterial species were used for this study. Gram-negative strains: Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC 10953), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (NCTC 9710/DSM 8324) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277). Gram-positive strains: Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and Enterococcus faecalis (DSMZ 20376). The bacterial strains were cultivated for 24 h at 37 °C under appropriate (aerobic/anaerobic) conditions in nutrient solution (SCHAEDLER-Broth; Oxoid, Germany) enriched with vitamin K (Roche, Germany). In the next step, the suspensions of bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase were centrifuged (4000 rpm, 5 min/Sigma, Eppendorf, Germany), rinsed twice using PBS (phosphate buffered saline/GIBCO, Germany) and resuspended to obtain a bacterial density of 108 bacteria/mL, that equals an optical density of 0.1 at 640 nm.

Antibacterial efficiency

MIC/MBC

To assess the susceptibility of oral pathogenic bacteria to silver(I) complexes, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were determined. For this purpose, test agents were dissolved in SCHAEDLER medium (Oxoid, Germany) to obtain a concentration of 40 mM. Serial dilution was performed for all compound solutions. Afterwards, 100 μL of each bacterial suspension (see 2.2) were pipetted into wells of microtiter plates (Greiner, Germany) containing 100 μL of the corresponding diluted compound solution. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the bacterial growth was evaluated. The MIC represents the dilution stage in which no clouding of the test specimen was observed. Pure SCHAEDLER medium served as positive control, SCHAEDLER medium including the same amount of the bacterial suspension as negative control. To distinguish MCI from MBC, 100 μL of each compound solution with concentrations below MIC were spread onto a Petri dish with SCHAEDLER agar (Oxoid, Germany) and cultivated under identical conditions. The concentration of the dilution series where no growth of bacteria was observed was considered as MBC.

Agar diffusion tests

To evaluate the antimicrobial concentration-related efficiency of the silver(I) complexes, agar diffusion tests were performed. The general procedure of this test was described previously in the literature [21]. Briefly: 100 ÎĽL of each bacterial suspension (108 bacteria/mL) were pipetted and spread onto a Petri dish with Schaedler agar (Oxoid, Germany). 100 ÎĽL of each test fluid were then filled into a central hole (diameter: 8 mm) of each Petri dish. After bacteria specific incubation time (>48 h), the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured. For positive (negative) control chlorhexidine (distilled water) was used. Six specimens were prepared for each test fluid (AgNO3; complex 3 and 4) with two different concentrations (10 mM and 20 mM).

Cytocompatibility

In vitro cytocompatibility tests were performed by exposing the test agents to human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). These fibroblasts were obtained from a gingiva biopsy of a periodontal healthy female patient (aged 42) by explant method. A written informed consent form was signed by the patient. Beforehand the study was approved by the Ethics Committee Jena (#1881-10/06; Ethics Committee of the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena at the Medical Faculty, Bachstrasse 18, 07740 Jena, Germany). HGF were chosen since they play a very important role in collagen metabolism and wound healing processes in periodontal lesions.

The cells were cultivated at 37 °C with 5 % of CO2 using DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) with 10 % of fetal calf serum and 0.1 % of AAS (antibiotic antimycotic solution). In our earlier publication [20] could be demonstrated that cytotoxicity and antiproliferative effects are not related to the type of sugar substituted to the complex. Therefore, only complex 3 was included in cytocompatibility tests of the present study.

HGFs were applied onto sterile cover glasses with a density of 8000 cells/cm2 and cultivated for 24 h under culture conditions. Complex 3, its corresponding ligand 1 and AgNO3 were diluted in DMEM to obtain a concentration of 20 mM for each test agent. Afterwards decimal serial dilution was conducted to obtain final concentrations of 20 mM, 2.0 mM, 0.2 mM, 0.02 mM and 0.002 mM. In the next step, the cell medium was removed from the cover glasses and 1 mL of each diluted test agent was applied to the HGFs. Pure cell medium served as negative control. After an incubation time of 24 h, the cell medium and test agent were pipetted off and HGFs were stained using a live/dead colorant (12 mL of PBS + 2 μL of fluorescein diacetate (vital) + 16 μL ethidium bromide [EtBr] (dead)) and evaluated using a Labophot microscope (Nikon, Japan) equipped with a 10xphase contrast objective (λex = 455 to 495 nm).

Statistical analysis

A t-test was performed using SPSS software (IBM; version 19) to determine whether the differences between inhibition zones of complex 3 and 4 compared to the control (AgNO3) are significant. P values < 0.005 are considered significant. The bars in the diagrams (Figs. 2 and 3) in which a statistically impact of the silver complex compared to AgNO3 at the same concentration (10 mM or 20 mM) was found (p < 0.005) were marked (*).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the synthesis of the studied silver(I) complexes tris[2-(β-d-thio-glucopyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (3) and tris[2-(α-d-thio-manno-pyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (4)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Diameters and standard deviations of the inhibition zones caused by AgNO3, silver complexes 3 and 4 for three tested Gram-negative bacterial species. No antibacterial effect was produced by the free ligands 1 and 2. Statistically significant differences compared to AgNO3 (same concentration) are marked (*)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Diameters and standard deviations of the inhibition zones caused by AgNO3, the silver complexes 3 and 4 for two tested Gram-positive bacterial species. No antibacterial effect was produced by the free ligands 1 and 2. Statistically significant differences compared to AgNO3 (same concentration) are marked (*)

Full size image

Results

The antibacterial efficiency of silver(I) carbohydrate complexes (GlcS-)3-N AgNO3 (3) and (ManS-)3-N AgNO3 (4) against the tested bacterial strains Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis was more pronounced than the effect of AgNO3.

MIC/MBC

The obtained MIC/MBC values of complexes 3, 4, AgNO3 and free ligands for the selected bacterial strains are shown in Table 1. For all tested bacterial species, inhibition of growth was observed by using silver complexes and AgNO3. Gram-negative bacterial strains had similar concentrations (MICs: P. gingivalis: 0.625 mM [3], 1.25 mM [4]; A. actinomycetemcomitans: 0.625 mM [3, 4] and F. nucleatum: 0.625 mM [3, 4]) compared to AgNO3 (P. gingivalis: 0.625 mM, A. actinomycetemcomitans: 0.625 mM and F. nucleatum: 0.625 mM). It is apparent that for Gram-positive species higher concentrations of the silver complexes (S. mutans: 10 mM [3], 20 mM [4] and E. faecalis: 10 mM [3], 20 mM [4]) are necessary to achieve effective inhibition of bacterial growth (MIC). For a complete suppression of bacteria (MBC), higher concentrations of the tested agents were essential in general. Also in this case a distinct difference between Gram-negative (1.25 to 2.5 mM) and Gram-positive (10 to 20 mM for complexes 3 and 4) species was observed. No antimicrobial effect was observed for the free ligands 1 and 2.

Table 1 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of the tested compounds on oral pathogenic bacterial strains
Full size table

Agar diffusion assay

This test showed that silver complexes 3 and 4 inhibit the growth of the tested oral pathogenic bacterial strains. Diameters of the inhibition zones and standard deviations are shown in Fig. 2 (Gram-negative) and 3 (Gram-positive bacterial strains).

For all tested Gram-negative bacterial strains (Fig. 2) silver complexes 3 and 4 generated larger diameters of inhibition zones (10 mM: 18 to 27 mm/20 mM: 16 to 31 mm) compared to AgNO3 (10 mM: 11 to 16 mm/20 mM: 16 to 20 mm). The largest inhibition zones were found for complex 3. It is apparent that in most cases the antibacterial efficiency against F. nucleatum and A. actinomycetemcomitans was more pronounced than against P. gingivalis.

In general, smaller inhibition zones were found for Gram-positive bacterial strains (Fig. 3). It has been shown that all tested agents have a greater antibacterial impact on S. mutans compared to E. faecalis. The largest inhibition zones were achieved by complex 3 (20 mM/S. mutans: 28 mm, E. faecalis: 18 mm).

Cytocompatibility tests

Figure 4 shows representative images of the microscopic analysis of the human gingival fibroblasts after being exposed to silver complex 3, ligand 1 and AgNO3. It was noted that AgNO3 has a cytotoxic impact on HGFs at a concentration above 0.02 mM. For silver complex 3, reduced cytotoxicity by the power of ten was shown. No cytotoxic impact on HGFs at all was observed for the free ligand 1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) after exposure to a silver nitrate, b silver complex 3 and c its corresponding free carbohydrate ligand 1 in different concentrations. Due to live/dead staining vital cells appear green while dead cells are red

Full size image

Discussion

Antiinfectious therapeutic agents play an important role in almost every field of medicine. Besides the widespread group of systemically applied classical antibiotics, alternative agents with antibacterial properties are increasingly discussed in the literature. Metal complexes are a promising class of materials with antimicrobial properties. By substitution with sugar residues, metal complexes can be modified to obtain higher levels of solubility and cytocompatibility, which is essential for their use in medicine [19, 22]. Similar silver(I) carbohydrate complexes with tripodal thioglycosides were synthesized and described in 2006 by Gottschaldt et al. [20]. In order to evaluate their possible application in dentistry, i.e. in periodontal, carious and endodontic treatment procedures, two silver complexes were investigated in this in vitro study: Tris[2-(β-D-thio-glucopyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (3) and tris[2-(α-D-thio-manno-pyranosyl)ethyl]-amine-silver(I)-nitrate (4).

Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis were used in this study as they play an important role in the etiology of periodontal diseases [23–25]. Streptococcus mutans was included due to its strong association with dental caries [18, 26]. Enterococcus faecalis, a representative species of the gastrointestinal flora, was also considered as it is the most frequently isolated bacterial strain in re-infected and insufficiently filled root canals [27, 28].

Relating to the inhibition zones of the agar diffusion assays the novel silver(I) carbohydrate complexes 3 and 4 were able to suppress the growth of all tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species (Figs. 2 and 3) adequately in vitro. However, the results of the agar diffusion assays should be interpreted for each test compound separately, depending on the ability of the complexes and AgNO3 to diffuse through the agarose gel.

MIC/MBC values (Tab. 1) showed that the Gram-negative species F. nucleatum, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis are more susceptible to the silver complexes compared to the Gram-positive species S. mutans and E. faecalis. Similar results were reported previously underlining the higher efficiency of silver ions against the Gram-negative bacterial species A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis P. intermedia and E. corrodens [29, 30]. It is assumed that the superior behavior against Gram-negative strains is caused by the lack of the thick protective peptidoglycan layer that can be found in Gram-positive bacterial species [31].

In fields of periodontal therapy there is still need for optimal antiinfectious agents [32]. It is well known that for the treatment of periodontitis the mechanical removal of subgingival biofilms by scaling and root planing is more effective when combined with systemic or local application of antibiotic agents [33, 34]. To avoid side effects and drug resistances caused by high doses of systemically applied antibiotics [35], antimicrobial agents that are applied directly in the periodontal pocket have attracted increasing interest over the last years [21].

The adequate antibacterial effectiveness of silver against periodontal pathogenic species was also shown in several studies. Kawahara et al. [29] demonstrated successfully the antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite against oral pathogenic species under anaerobic conditions to mimic the milieu of periodontal pockets. The study of Lu et al. [36] also focused on the antibacterial impact of differentially sized silver nanoparticles against anaerobic bacteria. In this case, the smallest tested nanoparticles (5 nm) showed higher antimicrobial effects compared to larger particles (15 to 55 nm). This suggests that also the small size of complexes 3 and 4 is a relevant factor for the adequate antibacterial properties. Also the weak binding of silver to thio-ether functions in complexes 3 and 4 leads to their high antibacterial activity. Bacterial proteins function as sulfur donor ligands that replace the ligands of the silver complexes [20, 37].

The high antibacterial efficiency in vitro indicates that the tested silver complexes 3 and 4 might be used as beneficial active ingredients in various types of dental materials. Since the early 20th century, the caries arresting effectiveness of silver nitrate, silver fluoride and silver diammine fluoride has been reported in numerous studies [38–40]. It should be noted that in some studies, black discolorations were observed using silver compounds like silver fluoride in high concentrations (up to 40 %) [39, 41]. In the context of our in vitro investigations no black staining could be detected when the silver complexes were in contact with DMEM medium or during agar diffusion assays. However, in the course of continuative studies (in vitro, later in vivo) we will clarify if silver complexes 3 and 4 also cause black discolorations in appropriate concentrations.

Other studies focused on the modification of increasingly applied dental composite filling materials [17, 18]. In 1999, Yoshida et al. reported on TEGDMA-UDMA based resin composites containing 5 and 7 wt-% silver supported active components, showing their antibacterial efficiency against S. mutans for six months in water while the mechanical qualities of the materials were not negatively affected [16]. With the modification of silver by synthesizing complexes like those used for this study, especially regarding functional groups and hydrophilic properties, material qualities of silver containing resin-based composites might be optimized while maintaining the antibacterial efficiency. Another beneficial aspect is the anti-biofilm effect of silver that was shown in numerous studies [18, 39, 42]. The suppression of bacterial biofilms on surfaces of implants or dental filling materials attracted much interest over the last years as negative effects like periodontitis, periimplantitis, gingivitis and secondary caries can be reduced [43, 44]. Further in vitro investigations of silver complexes should, therefore, also focus on their influence on dental plaque. It should be noted, however, that bacterial biofilms require considerably higher concentrations of antibacterial compounds for an effective removal [45]. Just like for classical antibiotics, the tested silver complexes could not be used in excessive concentrations to avoid cytotoxic side effects.

For E. faecalis, the diameters of the inhibition zones resulting from complex 3 and control AgNO3 in lower concentration (10 mM) are relatively small (10 to 11 mm). However, a clinical antibacterial benefit against E. faecalis will most likely by achieved by complex 3 at concentrations above 10 mM (Fig. 3). Since primarily infected endodontic lesions posses a mixture of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species, disinfection of root canals might also be another field of application in which the silver-complexes could possibly be used. Besides mechanical preparation of the root canals, chemical agents are required for the debridement of infected root dentine. Next to the most common irrigation agents like sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) [46], in addition solutions containing silver complexes might enhance chemical eradication of the pathogen microorganisms. In 2008, Kreth et al. [16] reported about the successful impregnation of silver ions into endodontic sealers to achieve a more profound antibacterial impact. Such approaches should be considered in further studies to thwart the residual bacteria in root canals, which may have resulted in reinfection and treatment failure. The good water solubility of the complexes 3 and 4 might also enable their incorporation in well-established irrigation agents as mentioned above.

The experiments show that complex 3 reveals a lower cytotoxic impact compared to AgNO3 on human gingival fibroblasts (HGF). HGF represent the predominant cell type in the oral cavity. Particularly in the context of wound healing in periodontal lesions, HGF play a very important role due to their contribution in collagen metabolism. On this account HGF were chosen for cytocompatibility investigations by our group and in other studies [47, 48].

As shown before in a previous report, cytotoxicity and antiproliferative effects are not related to the type of sugar substituted to the complex [20]. Therefore, only complex 3 was included in cytocompatibility tests of the present study. However, the results of this study are consistent with the cytotoxicity test performed with other cell lines, L-929 (mouse fibroblasts) and HeLa (human cervix carcinoma) in which silver complexes had a significantly lower cytotoxic potential compared to AgNO3 [20]. On the other hand, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (see Table 1) of the tested bacterial strains are considerably higher than the concentration of complex 3 (0.02 mM) in which no cytotoxic impact on human gingival fibroblast was found (Fig. 4). This might limit the spectrum of clinical applications. In the treatment of periodontal lesions, active compounds such as antibiotics are applied directly in the periodontal pocket using drug carrier systems for a controlled release [49]. Also in endodontic lesions, the cavity itself limits the field of action, so that direct contact with keratinocytes and other cells is the oral cavity is very unlikely especially when a dental rubber dam is applied.

The widespread use of silver, silver nano particles and silver complexes in medical devices indicate adequate biocompatibility. In a study of Zhao et al. [50], the cytotoxic impact of silver nanoparticles on rat osteoblasts has been reduced by controlling the release rate of silver from titania nanotubes. Also for the tested silver complexes in this study, a controlled release would be essential for their possible application in vivo to balance the ratio between antibacterial efficiency and cytocompatibility.

Conclusion

The highly water soluble silver(I) carbohydrate complexes (GlcS-)3-N AgNO3 (3) and (ManS-)3-N AgNO3 (4) have a greater antibacterial efficiency against the tested bacterial strains Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis than AgNO3. Compared to silver nitrate, silver (I) complex 3 possesses a lower cytotoxic effect on human gingival fibroblasts. The results of this study suggest that the innovative silver (I) complexes 3 and 4 represent new potential antibacterial agents for use in various treatment procedures of periodontal, carious and endodontic diseases.

Abbreviations

AAS:

Antibiotic antimycotic solution

A. actino-mycetemcomitans:

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

E. faecalis:

Enterococcus faecalis

F. nucleatum:

Fusobacterium nucleatum

HGF:

Human gingival fibroblasts

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

P. gingivalis:

Porphyromonas gingivalis

S. mutans:

Streptococcus mutans

References

  1. Chamakura K, Perez-Ballestero R, Luo Z, Bashir S, Liu J. Comparison of bactericidal activities of silver nanoparticles with common chemical disinfectants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;84:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Silver S, Phung le T, Silver G. Silver as biocides in burn and wound dressings and bacterial resistance to silver compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Monteiro DR, Silva S, Negri M, Gorup LF, de Camargo ER, Oliveira R, et al. Silver nanoparticles: Influence of stabilizing agent and diameter on antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012;54:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Kook JK, Lim BS. Experimental antimicrobial orthodontic adhesives using nanofillers and silver nanoparticles. Dent Mater. 2009;25:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McCann M, Geraghty M, Devereux M, O’Shea D, Mason J, O’Sullivan L. Insights into the mode of action of the anti-Candida activity of 1,10-phenanthroline and its metal chelates. Met Based Drugs. 2000;7:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCann M, Curran R, Ben-Shoshan M, McKee V, Tahir AA, Devereux M, et al. Silver(I) complexes of 9-anthracenecarboxylic acid and imidazoles: synthesis, structure and antimicrobial activity. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasuga NC, Yoshikawa R, Sakai Y, Nomiya K. Syntheses, structures, and antimicrobial activities of remarkably light-stable and water-soluble silver complexes with amino acid derivatives, silver(I) N-acetylmethioninates. Inorg Chem. 2012;51:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sigusch B, Beier M, Klinger G, Pfister W, Glockmann E. A 2-step non-surgical procedure and systemic antibiotics in the treatment of rapidly progressive periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2001;72:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Castilho AR, Duque C, Negrini Tde C, Sacono NT, de Paula AB, Sacramento PA, et al. Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing doxycycline hyclate. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Valappil SP, Coombes M, Wright L, Owens GJ, Lynch RJ, Hope CK, et al. Role of gallium and silver from phosphate-based glasses on in vitro dual species oral biofilm models of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus gordonii. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Mulder J, Holmgren C, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries preventive efficacy of silver diammine fluoride (SDF) and ART sealants in a school-based daily fluoride toothbrushing program in the Philippines. BMC oral health. 2012;12.

  14. Zhang K, Cheng L, Imazato S, Antonucci JM, Lin NJ, Lin-Gibson S, et al. Effects of dual antibacterial agents MDPB and nano-silver in primer on microcosm biofilm, cytotoxicity and dentine bond properties. J Dent. 2013;41:5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blocher S, Frankenberger R, Hellak A, Schauseil M, Roggendorf MJ, Korbmacher-Steiner HM. Effect on enamel shear bond strength of adding microsilver and nanosilver particles to the primer of an orthodontic adhesive. BMC oral health. 2015;15:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreth J, Kim D, Nguyen M, Hsiao G, Mito R, Kang MK, et al. The Antimicrobial Effect of Silver Ion Impregnation into Endodontic Sealer against Streptococcus mutans. Open Dent J. 2008;2.

  17. Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Matsumoto S, Yamada T, Atsuta M. Antibacterial activity of resin composites with silver-containing materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999;107:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burgers R, Eidt A, Frankenberger R, Rosentritt M, Schweikl H, Handel G, et al. The anti-adherence activity and bactericidal effect of microparticulate silver additives in composite resin materials. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gottschaldt M, Schubert US. Prospects of metal complexes peripherally substituted with sugars in biomedicinal applications. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gottschaldt M, Pfeifer A, Koth D, Görls H, Dahse HM, Möllmann U, et al. Silver(I) complexes based on novel tripodal thioglycosides: Synthesis, structure and antimicrobial activity. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reise M, Wyrwa R, Muller U, Zylinski M, Volpel A, Schnabelrauch M, et al. Release of metronidazole from electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-D/L-lactide) fibers for local periodontitis treatment. Dent Mater. 2012;28:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gottschaldt M, Bohlender C, Muller D, Klette I, Baum RP, Yano S, et al. Rhenium and 99 m-technetium complexes of monosaccharide based tripodal triamines as potential radio imaging agents. Dalton Trans. 2009;26.

  23. Sigusch BW, GĂĽntsch A, Pfitzner A, Glockmann E. Enhanced root planing and systemic metronidazole administration improve clinical and microbiological outcomes in a two-step treatment procedure. J Periodontol. 2005;76:6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maezono H, Noiri Y, Asahi Y, Yamaguchi M, Yamamoto R, Izutani N, et al. Antibiofilm effects of azithromycin and erythromycin on Porphyromonas gingivalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papastamou V, Nietzsch T, Staudte H, Orellana G, Sigusch BW. Photoinactivation of F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis using the ruthenium-based RD3 sensitizer and a conventional halogen lamp. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cross SE, Kreth J, Wali RP, Sullivan R, Shi W, Gimzewski JK. Evaluation of bacteria-induced enamel demineralization using optical profilometry. Dent Mater. 2009;25:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kranz S, Guellmar A, Volpel A, Gitter B, Albrecht V, Sigusch BW. Photodynamic suppression of Enterococcus faecalis using the photosensitizer mTHPC. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lins RX, de Oliveira AA, Hirata Junior R, Wilson MJ, Lewis MA, Williams DW, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence traits of Enterococcus faecalis from primary endodontic infections. J Dent. 2013;41:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawahara K, Tsuruda K, Morishita M, Uchida M. Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite on oral bacteria under anaerobic conditions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spacciapoli P, Buxton D, Rothstein D, Friden P. Antimicrobial activity of silver nitrate against periodontal pathogens. J Periodontal Res. 2001;36:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silvestry-Rodriguez N, Bright KR, Slack DC, Uhlmann DR, Gerba CP. Silver as a residual disinfectant to prevent biofilm formation in water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hosaka Y, Saito A, Maeda R, Fukaya C, Morikawa S, Makino A, et al. Antibacterial activity of povidone-iodine against an artificial biofilm of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Winkelhoff AJ, Winkel EG. Antibiotics in periodontics: right or wrong? J Periodontol. 2009;80:10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walker CB, Godowski KC, Borden L, Lennon J, Nango S, Stone C, et al. The effects of sustained release doxycycline on the anaerobic flora and antibiotic-resistant patterns in subgingival plaque and saliva. J Periodontol. 2000;71:5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Handal T, Caugant DA, Olsen I. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from subgingival plaque in a norwegian population with refractory marginal periodontitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lu Z, Rong K, Li J, Yang H, Chen R. Size-dependent antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles against oral anaerobic pathogenic bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nomiya K, Tsuda K, Sudoh T, Oda M. Ag(I)-N bond-containing compound showing wide spectra in effective antimicrobial activities: polymeric silver(I) imidazolate. J Inorg Biochem. 1997;68:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhi QH, Lo EC, Lin HC. Randomized clinical trial on effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer in arresting dentine caries in preschool children. J Dent. 2012;40:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Peng JJ, Botelho MG, Matinlinna JP. Silver compounds used in dentistry for caries management: a review. J Dent. 2012;40:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mei ML, Ito L, Cao Y, Lo EC, Li QL, Chu CH. An ex vivo study of arrested primary teeth caries with silver diamine fluoride therapy. J Dent. 2014;42:4.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Craig GG, Powell KR, Price CA. Clinical evaluation of a modified silver fluoride application technique designed to facilitate lesion assessment in outreach programs. BMC oral health. 2013;13.

  42. Roe D, Karandikar B, Bonn-Savage N, Gibbins B, Roullet JB. Antimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticles. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Melo MA, Cheng L, Weir MD, Hsia RC, Rodrigues LK, Xu HH. Novel dental adhesive containing antibacterial agents and calcium phosphate nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gordon O, Vig Slenters T, Brunetto PS, Villaruz AE, Sturdevant DE, Otto M, et al. Silver coordination polymers for prevention of implant infection: thiol interaction, impact on respiratory chain enzymes, and hydroxyl radical induction. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:10.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Klein MI, Duarte S, Xiao J, Mitra S, Foster TH, Koo H. Structural and molecular basis of the role of starch and sucrose in Streptococcus mutans biofilm development. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Ali M, Sathorn C, Parashos P. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Int Endod J. 2012;45:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Flemingson, Emmadi P, Ambalavanan N, Ramakrishnan T, Vijayalakshmi R. Effect of three commercial mouth rinses on cultured human gingival fibroblast: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mariotti AJ, Rumpf DA. Chlorhexidine-induced changes to human gingival fibroblast collagen and non-collagen protein production. J Periodontol. 1999;70:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonito AJ, Lux L, Lohr KN. Impact of local adjuncts to scaling and root planing in periodontal disease therapy: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2005;76:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao L, Wang H, Huo K, Cui L, Zhang W, Ni H, et al. Antibacterial nano-structured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2011;32:24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Carl-Zeiss Stiftung (Strukturantrag JCSM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Markus Reise, Carina Matz, Andrea Völpel & Bernd W. Sigusch

  2. Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstr. 10, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Michael Gottschaldt & Ulrich S. Schubert

  3. Jena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM), Philosophenweg 7, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Michael Gottschaldt, Klaus D. Jandt & Ulrich S. Schubert

  4. Chair of Materials Science, Otto Schott Institute for Materials Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, FraunhoferstraĂźe 6, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Klaus D. Jandt

Authors
  1. Markus Reise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Gottschaldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carina Matz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Völpel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Klaus D. Jandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ulrich S. Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernd W. Sigusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Reise.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Authors’ contributions

MR: Corresponding author, creation of the study design, data analysis, MG: development and synthesis of silver complexes, essential preliminary tests, CM: Laboratory work (bacteria and cell tests), agar diffusion assays, AV: Laboratory work (bacteria and cell tests), Statistical analysis, cytocompatibility tests, KDJ: development and synthesis of silver complexes, USS: development and synthesis of silver complexes, essential preliminary tests, BWS: creation of the study design, data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reise, M., Gottschaldt, M., Matz, C. et al. Antibacterial effect of silver (I) carbohydrate complexes on oral pathogenic key species in vitro. BMC Oral Health 16, 42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0201-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0201-4

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us