Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nada Suliman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oyinkansola Sofola |
9 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna-Lena Ostberg |
10 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magnus Hakeberg |
11 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Najith Amarasena |
2 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nada Suliman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna-Lena Ostberg |
21 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oyinkansola Sofola |
21 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magnus Hakeberg |
3 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nada Suliman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nada Suliman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna-Lena Ostberg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
8 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6831-12-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.