Table 3 |
|||||
|
Optimal cutoffs of waist circumference in different HOMA-IR values from ROC curve analysis |
|||||
|
HOMA-IR |
Prevalence (%) |
Cutoff of WC (cm) |
Sensitivity (%) |
Specificity (%) |
Youden index |
|
|
|||||
|
1.50 |
34.9 |
80 |
91.5 |
39.5 |
0.310 |
|
85 |
70.4 |
70.0 |
0.403 |
||
|
90 |
38.8 |
89.5 |
0.284 |
||
|
2.00 |
20.3 |
80 |
94.0 |
34.4 |
0.285 |
|
85 |
78.0 |
64.5 |
0.425 |
||
|
90 |
47.6 |
86.6 |
0.342 |
||
|
2.50 |
12.0 |
80 |
96.0 |
32.0 |
0.280 |
|
85 |
83.8 |
61.3 |
0.451 |
||
|
90 |
56.1 |
84.5 |
0.406 |
||
|
3.00 |
7.8 |
80 |
96.3 |
30.7 |
0.270 |
|
85 |
85.3 |
59.3 |
0.446 |
||
|
90 |
60.1 |
83.0 |
0.430 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
ROC, receiver operating characteristics; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; WC, waist circumference. |
|||||
|
Tabata et al. BMC Endocrine Disorders 2009 9:1 doi:10.1186/1472-6823-9-1 |
|||||
