Table 4

Comparison of the function performances.

decoy set
protein
DFIRE-A
DFIRE-B
DOPE
RAPDF
PC2CA
DFMAC

4state_reduced
1ctf
1
1
1
1
1
1
4state_reduced
2cro
1
2
1
1
1
1
4state_reduced
4rxn
1
19
1
1
667
1
fisa
2cro
1
1
1
14
1
1
fisa_casp3
1bl0
1
3
1
1
1
8
lattice_ssfit
1dkt-A
1
1
1
1
1
1
lattice_ssfit
1pgb
1
1
1
1
1
1
lmds
1b0n-B
430
261
34
359
1
1
lmds
1dtk
1
5
1
116
2
70
lmds
1shf-A
1
1
1
1
1
1
lmds
4pti
1
1
1
157
1
3

average

40.0
26.9
4.0
59.4
61.6
8.1
correct

10
6
10
7
9
8

The rank of the native structure identified by respective functions is shown for the targets listed. The results of DFIRE-A, DFIRE-B and RAPDF were from the literature [7]. The results of DOPE were from [15]. The results of PC2CA were from [16]. The average rank (average) and the number of correctly identified native structures (correct) in 11 targets are shown.

Makino and Itoh BMC Structural Biology 2008 8:46   doi:10.1186/1472-6807-8-46