Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Structural Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

CUSP: an algorithm to distinguish structurally conserved and unconserved regions in protein domain alignments and its application in the study of large length variations

Sankaran Sandhya1, Barah Pankaj12, Madabosse Kande Govind1, Bernard Offmann3, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan4 and Ramanathan Sowdhamini1*

Author Affiliations

1 National Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), UAS-GKVK Campus, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India

2 Mathematical modeling and Computational Biology group, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India

3 Laboratoire de Biochimie et Génétique Moléculaire, Université de La Réunion, La Réunion, France

4 Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Structural Biology 2008, 8:28  doi:10.1186/1472-6807-8-28

Published: 31 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Distantly related proteins adopt and retain similar structural scaffolds despite length variations that could be as much as two-fold in some protein superfamilies. In this paper, we describe an analysis of indel regions that accommodate length variations amongst related proteins. We have developed an algorithm CUSP, to examine multi-membered PASS2 superfamily alignments to identify indel regions in an automated manner. Further, we have used the method to characterize the length, structural type and biochemical features of indels in related protein domains.

Results

CUSP, examines protein domain structural alignments to distinguish regions of conserved structure common to related proteins from structurally unconserved regions that vary in length and type of structure. On a non-redundant dataset of 353 domain superfamily alignments from PASS2, we find that 'length- deviant' protein superfamilies show > 30% length variation from their average domain length. 60% of additional lengths that occur in indels are short-length structures (< 5 residues) while 6% of indels are > 15 residues in length. Structural types in indels also show class-specific trends.

Conclusion

The extent of length variation varies across different superfamilies and indels show class-specific trends for preferred lengths and structural types. Such indels of different lengths even within a single protein domain superfamily could have structural and functional consequences that drive their selection, underlying their importance in similarity detection and computational modelling. The availability of systematic algorithms, like CUSP, should enable decision making in a domain superfamily-specific manner.