Table 2

Comparisons between apo and holo heme protein structures

holo-chain

volume

3)

surface

area (Å2)

Rvsa

apo-chain

volume

3)

surface area (Å2)

Rvsa

sequence identity%

RMSD

(Å)


1KBIA

458.1

432

1.060

1SZFB

1039.3

708.3

1.468

99

0.40

1N45A

1634.7

1139.3

1.435

1S8CD

845.1

634.4

1.332

100

0.86

1N5UA

*

*

*

3CX9A

*

*

*

100

0.60

2ITFA

721.7

521

1.385

2ITEB

803.4

551

1.457

100

0.60

2NWBA

*

*

*

1ZEEB

*

*

*

96

0.75

2OFRX

1211.1

857.4

1.413

2OFMX

783.3

642.7

1,219

100

1.03

2R7AA

1362.6

963.4

1.414

2RG7D

1558.1

1019.6

1.528

100

0.91

2ZDOA

808.7

553.9

1.460

1XBWD

766.9

544.2

1.409

99

0.59

3CQVA

1638.3

1099

1.490

2V7CA

537.1

436.2

1.232

94

2.32

3EMMA

399

383.1

1.042

2A13A

910.8

635.2

1.434

100

0.53


a Rvs: ratio between volume and surface area

* Data not shown because CASTp predicts a very large cavity, covering several pockets.

Li et al. BMC Structural Biology 2011 11:13   doi:10.1186/1472-6807-11-13

Open Data