Table 4 |
||||||
| Summary of the candidate models predicting the probability of survival (Φ) | ||||||
| Model | Φ | p | npar | QAICc | ∆QAICc | Model weight |
| 1 | Constant | Time | 4 | 163.68 | 0.000 | 0.273 |
| 2 | Wing length | Time | 5 | 163.86 | 0.185 | 0.249 |
| 3 | Sex | Time | 5 | 164.67 | 0.995 | 0.166 |
| 4 | Age | Time | 5 | 165.71 | 2.034 | 0.099 |
| 5 | Age + Wing length | Time | 6 | 165.85 | 2.176 | 0.092 |
| 6 | Sex + Wing length | Time | 6 | 165.92 | 2.243 | 0.089 |
| 7 | Age + Sex + Wing length | Time | 7 | 167.93 | 4.257 | 0.032 |
The model with Time alone was found to be the best model for predicting the probability of recapture (p), and thus p remains as a constant in this model; npar shows the number of parameters; QAICc is the adjusted AIC value following correction for overdipersion, and ∆QAICc shows the difference between the specified model and the ‘best’ model. Models with a ∆QAICc < 2 are considered not to differ from the best model.
Dunn et al.
Dunn et al. BMC Ecology 2013 13:30 doi:10.1186/1472-6785-13-30