Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Biotechnology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Methodology article

An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol

Huanting Liu and James H Naismith

Author Affiliations

SSPF, Centre for Biomolecular Science, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9ST, UK

BMC Biotechnology 2008, 8:91  doi:10.1186/1472-6750-8-91


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/8/91


Received:21 September 2008
Accepted:4 December 2008
Published:4 December 2008

© 2008 Liu and Naismith; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Mutagenesis plays an essential role in molecular biology and biochemistry. It has also been used in enzymology and protein science to generate proteins which are more tractable for biophysical techniques. The ability to quickly and specifically mutate a residue(s) in protein is important for mechanistic and functional studies. Although many site-directed mutagenesis methods have been developed, a simple, quick and multi-applicable method is still desirable.

Results

We have developed a site-directed plasmid mutagenesis protocol that preserved the simple one step procedure of the QuikChange™ site-directed mutagenesis but enhanced its efficiency and extended its capability for multi-site mutagenesis. This modified protocol used a new primer design that promoted primer-template annealing by eliminating primer dimerization and also permitted the newly synthesized DNA to be used as the template in subsequent amplification cycles. These two factors we believe are the main reasons for the enhanced amplification efficiency and for its applications in multi-site mutagenesis.

Conclusion

Our modified protocol significantly increased the efficiency of single mutation and also allowed facile large single insertions, deletions/truncations and multiple mutations in a single experiment, an option incompatible with the standard QuikChange™. Furthermore the new protocol required significantly less parental DNA which facilitated the DpnI digestion after the PCR amplification and enhanced the overall efficiency and reliability. Using our protocol, we generated single site, multiple single-site mutations and a combined insertion/deletion mutations. The results demonstrated that this new protocol imposed no additional reagent costs (beyond basic QuikChange™) but increased the overall success rates.

Background

Site-directed mutagenesis is the cornerstone of modern molecular biology allowing exquisite control of protein sequence. This technique is essential in functional study, genetic engineering, biochemistry and protein engineering. The last category is particularly diverse, including the humanization of antibodies, introduction of new catalytic activities and creation of proteins more suited to biophysical (predominantly structural) characterization. A number of strategies have been developed [1-12] with the QuikChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis System developed by Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) probably the most favored. QuikChange™ works by using a pair of complementary primers with a mutation. In a round of PCR cycles these primers anneal to the template DNA, replicating the plasmid DNA with the mutation. The mutant DNA product has a strand break (nick) (Figure 1A). The resulting DNA pool (mutant and parental) is then treated with DpnI to destroy the parental methylated DNA from the newly synthesized unmethylated mutant DNA and transformed into E. coli cells where the nick is ligated by host repair enzymes. The process while extremely useful and simple does have some limitations [13]. As the primers completely overlap, self annealing is quite favorable and care in primer design is required to avoid self pairing competing with template annealing. As the newly synthesized DNA is "nicked", it cannot be used as a template for subsequent amplification in contrast to "normal" PCR (Figure 1A). This constraint leads to a lower PCR amplification efficiency. Although increasing the amount of parental template DNA can help to alleviate this problem it can introduce other complications. As originally developed QuikChange™ cannot introduce multiple mutations, a modified version of the kit (QuikChange™ Multi Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit) has been released and some other adaptations have been reported [14-19]. However, these procedures are either multistep and/or require phosphorylation of oligos and/or enzymatic ligation steps. Addition of short (around 8 base) non-overlapping ends to the primers has been reported and this modification simplified primer design [13]. Deletion or insertion mutations however remain beyond the scope of basic QuikChange™.

thumbnailFigure 1. Schematic presentations of mutagenesis PCR amplification processes. A) Using the primers designed as recommended in the QuickChange™ protocol. PCR extension fails when primers annealed to newly synthesised "nicked" DNA. B) Using the new primer design to generate single-site mutation, deletion or insertion. C) Using the new primer design to generate double mutations, deletions or insertions. The gray cycles represent the parental plasmid DNA, the cycles of dash lines represent the DNA amplified using the parental DNA as templates while the cycles of gapped dash line are the DNA amplified using the newly-synthesized DNA as templates. Arrows indicate the numbered primers; Triangles indicate the location of the mutations/deletions/insertions; Short bars indicate the "nicks" in the newly-synthesized DNA molecules.

In our structural proteomics lab, site-directed mutagenesis, truncation and deletion mutagenesis are routine methods used by variety of personnel with different expertise in molecular biology. Although most problems with QuikChange™ can be overcome with modification or refinement, we encountered problems in mutation of low GC sequences from cloned Sulfolobus islandicus rudivirus (SIRV) CAG38830 and CAG38833 [20] which we were unable to solve. These problems led us to consider a modification to QuikChange™ that would preserve its simplicity but enhance its efficiency and applicability. Our modified method uses primers containing extended non-overlapping sequences at the 3' end (significantly larger than suggested in [13]) and primer-primer complementary sequences at the 5' end (Figure 2). We used this modified method to make various mutations, including insertions (18 residues) and deletions (25 residues) in a cloned vraR gene of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [21]. We have also used four primers to create multiple-site mutations, deletions and insertions. This modified procedure has proven to be highly efficient.

thumbnailFigure 2. Schematic diagram of the primer design for site-directed mutagenesis. Primer designs are shown for site-directed mutation (A), deletion (B) and insertion (C). Triangles, DEL and INS indicate the locations of the mutations, deletion and insertion respectively in the primer sequences.

Results

Primer design

Our new primer design scheme minimized the primer-primer dimerisation and enabled the primers to use the PCR products as the template. The schematic presentation of our new primer design is shown in Figure 2. Each primer pair contains non-overlapping sequences at their 3' end and primer-primer complementary (overlapping) sequences at the 5' end. The non-overlapping sequences are larger (significantly larger than suggested in [13]) than the complementary sequences to make the melting temperature of non-overlapping sequences (Tm no) 5 to 10°C higher than the melting temperature of primer-primer complementary sequences (Tm pp). The mutation sites can be placed either in the complementary region or non-overlapping region. Using the primers designed by our new scheme, the newly synthesized PCR products can be used as the templates in the subsequent PCR amplification cycles, which significantly increased the PCR efficiency and required less template DNA while it is unfeasible in the QuickChange™ or the modification reported previously [13].

Single-site mutation and deletion

Using the primer pair of 3026L/M, 3051L/M, 3327L/M, 3056L/M, FabH2111C/A, FabH2111C/S (Table 1), six single-site mutagenesis reactions were carried out to substitute residues Leu26, Leu51 in CAG38830, Leu27 and Leu56 in CAG38833 by methionines and Cys111 in FabH2 by an alanine and a serine respectively. As controls one primer pair of 3026L/M designed as recommended in the QuikChange™ manual and another designed as described in [13] were tested. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed the synthesis of the full-length plasmid DNA (Figure 3A). DNA quantification showed that amplifications of 3026L/M, 3051L/M and FabH2111C/S produced approximately 1 μg of the synthesized plasmid DNA respectively in each reaction while amplifications of 3327L/M, 3056L/M and FabH2111C/A produced approximately 500 ng respectively. In comparison with the DNA produced using the primer pairs designed by our new scheme the control PCR reactions produced 35 ng for 3026L/M(13) and about 5 ng for 3026L/M(QC). Transformation of E. coli cells with these DNA resulted in a large number of colonies (Figure 3B) indicating a high PCR amplification efficiency. DNA sequencing showed that in each mutagenesis reaction all four transformants contained the desired mutations (Figure 3B). Under these conditions neither control experiment gave colonies which harbored the desired mutants despite five attempts.

thumbnailFigure 3. PCR amplification for single-site mutagenesis. A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR reactions indicating the amplification efficiency. The names of the mutants are shown on the top of each lane. B) Transformation and mutation efficiency of each reaction for 3026L/M, 3051L/M, 3327L/M, 3356L/M, FabH2111C/A, FabH2111C/S. Labels for the generated mutants are detailed in the text. 3026L/M(13) and 3026L/M(QC) are control PCR reactions using primer pairs designed as [13] and QuickChange™ protocol respectively.

Table 1. Primers used for mutagenesis

Using the primer pairs of VRARN3, VRARC5 and VRARDHIS (Table 1), we successfully generated a vraR clone with three residues deleted from its N-terminus, a clone with five residues deleted from its C-terminus and a clone with its His tag removed from the N-terminus. PCR amplifications of these mutants again showed high amplification efficiency (Figure 4A). Transformation of E. coli cells with these PCR products produced more than 100 colonies (Figure 4B). Sequencing the plasmid DNA showed that in each reaction all four isolated recombinants contained the desired deletions.

thumbnailFigure 4. PCR amplification for single-site deletions. A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR reactions indicating the amplification efficiency. The names of the mutants are shown on the top of each lane. B) Transformation and mutation efficiency for VraRNHISD, VraRC5D and VraRN3D, cloned vraR genes with its N-terminal His tag removal, five residues from the C-terminus and three residues from the N-terminus deleted respectively.

Multiple-site mutations, deletions and insertions

Using two primer pairs 3026L/M and 3051L/M, 3327L/M and 3056L/M (Table 1) double mutant 3026L/M-51L/M of gene CAG38830 and 3327L/M-56L/M of gene CAG38833 were engineered. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplified DNA and the colonies produced after transformation are shown in Figure 5. Although partial elongated plasmid DNA fragments were produced in the PCR amplifications, a large number of recombinants demonstrated that our mutagenesis protocol was effective for engineering double mutations. To test the efficiency for multiple-site deletion/insertion in a single step, mutagenesis was carried out using two primer pairs VRARN3 and VRARC5 to remove three residues at the N-terminus and five residues at C-terminus of a clone vraR gene in pDESVRAR for maximum likelihood of crystallisation. A similar experiment with two primer pairs VRARDHIS and VRARIHIS was set up to remove the N-terminal TEV protease cleavable His-tag and insert a C-terminal His-tag in a single reaction. Analysis of the PCR products is shown in Figure 5A. In addition to the full-length PCR products, some partial PCR fragments accumulated in these PCR reactions. These partial amplified DNA fragments were generated with a forward primer and a reverse primer of the downstream primer pair (schematically presented in Figure 1C, primer 1 and primer 4, primer 3 and primer 2) misbridging the "nicks" during the amplification. These partial DNA fragments share some overlap sequences within their primer pairs and could anneal via primer-primer overlapping sequences or act as megaprimers [6] annealed to the template and elongated into the full length plasmid DNA in the subsequent amplification cycles or similar to that described [7]. The synthesis of the full length PCR products for the double-site mutations (3026L/M-51L/M and 3327L/M-56L/M) was more efficient than the multiple-site deletions (Figure 5A). Nevertheless full-length products were produced and transformation of the E. coli cells with these products produced viable transformants. DNA sequencing showed that three of four transformants contained the desired mutations.

thumbnailFigure 5. PCR amplification for multiple-site mutagenesis. A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR reactions indicating the amplification efficiency. The names of the mutants are shown on the top of each lane. B) Transformation and mutation efficiency for 3026L/M-51L/M, both Leu26 and Leu51 in CAG38830 substituted by methionines, 3327L/M-56L/M, both Leu27 and Leu56 in CAG38833 substituted by methionines, VraRDNH/ICH, a cloned vraR gene with its N-terminal His tag removed and C-terminal His tag inserted and VraRDN3/DC5, a cloned vraR gene with three residues from the N-terminus and five from the C-terminus deleted. Arrows indicate the partial PCR amplification products.

Discussion

QuickChange™ site-directed mutagenesis has transformed the ability of labs to carry out site-directed mutagenesis. However its relatively low PCR amplification efficiency can lead to problems and the primer design needs care. Adding additional template alleviates this but can decrease the success rate for obtaining mutants as it leads to a increase of the amount of hemimethylated DNA molecules (newly synthesized strand combined with parental strand) which is resistant to DpnI digestion [22]. Incomplete digestion results in recovery of non-mutated DNA. Modified primer design which destabilizes primer pairs has been proposed [13] to simplify the procedure. However, this and the original method can only use the parental DNA as template in the amplification cycles. This is because the primers either do not bridge or are too short to efficiently bridge the "nick" in the newly synthesized strands. By significantly increasing the non-overlapping region the primers should be long enough to bridge the "nick" and bind to the newly synthesized DNA and thus use it as template (Figure 1B, C) in the same way as normal PCR. We therefore designed primers which contain non-overlapping sequence and primer-primer complementary (overlapping) with a Tm no 5 to 10°C higher than the Tm pp so that the non-overlapping sequences can bridge the "nick" and bind to the newly synthesized DNA efficiently. These primer lengths are within the normal range suggested for QuikChange™ and therefore do not impose any additional costs to the laboratory. The PCR amplification using these primers showed high efficiency and as a result it required less than half the parental template and fewer amplification cycles. The decreased amount of parental DNA has the significant added benefit that decreases the amount of methylated and hemimethylated DNA which needs to be destroyed by DpnI, reducing the potential to recover the parental DNA.

The modified primer design as with that proposed earlier [13] eliminates the problems associated with primer pair self-annealing, and Tm values can be designed as these for conventional PCR [23]. Moreover the restriction upon primer length is also lifted which enhances the utility of the technique. The removal of the primer length limitation allows adjacent multiple mutations to be made in a single step with a pair of mutagenesis primers without any limitation. We have successfully generated double mutations, double deletion and N-terminal deletion and C-terminal insertion mutants simultaneously in a single experiment, demonstrating that this modified method is efficient for multiple site-directed mutagenesis. PCR amplification for multiple-site mutagenesis produced partial DNA fragments with the forward primer in a primer pair (primer 1, Figure 1C) and the reverse primer of the downstream primer pair (primer 4, Figure 1C). These partial elongated DNA fragments annealed each other with their overlap sequences and extended to the full-length plasmid DNA in the subsequent PCR cycles [24] or functioned as the megaprimers in the subsequent cycles as described [11]. There is no distance restriction of the mutation sites. However a long single pair primer should be used for the adjacent multiple mutations. In our experiments the double mutations (3026L/M-51L/M and 3327L/M-56L/M) spanned around 80 base pairs produced more full-length plasmid suggesting that the short partial PCR products could act as megaprimers in the subsequent amplification cycles more efficiently in comparison with the longer PCR fragments (VraRDNH/ICH and VraRDN3/DC5). An extra a few cycles using Tm pp-5 as the annealing temperature can increase the synthesis of the full-length plasmid and placing the mutation sites within the primer-primer overlap sequence can increase the mutation efficiency. Although Tm pp and Tm no of the primer pairs can be variable, a Tm no volume of the primer pairs 5°C to 10°C higher than Tm pp is required for an efficient PCR amplification. Under our PCR conditions, no plasmid concatemers were detected.

Our results demonstrated that the modified protocol is a high efficient method for single site mutagenesis and can be extended to multiple site-directed insertion deletion mutagenesis protocol without any extra steps such as ligation or phosphorylation.

Conclusion

As a result of this research, we have modified the site-directed mutagenesis protocol which increased the efficiency for single- and multiple-site mutations and also enabled facile large single insertions and deletions/truncations in a single experiment, an option incompatible with the standard QuikChange™ protocol or with the protocols reported previously [8,12,13,17,19,25-27]. This single-step protocol utilized a new primer designing scheme and required significantly less parental DNA which facilitated its digestion after the PCR and enhanced the overall efficiency and reliability.

Six single-site mutations and three deletion mutants were generated using this modified protocol. The PCR amplifications with the primers designed by the new scheme revealed high amplification efficiency and required less parental DNA and PCR cycles. Sequence analysis the plasmid DNA revealed that in each mutagenesis reaction all four transformants contained the desired mutations or deletions. Four double-site mutations and two double-site deletions or deletion/insertion were generated using this method. A large number of recombinants demonstrated that our mutagenesis protocol was effective for engineering double mutations, deletions and insertions. Despite the fact that partial elongation products were produced and the syntheses of the full-length plasmid DNA variable, transformation of the resulting products into E. coli cells produced viable transformants. Three of four sequenced transformants contained the desired mutations.

Our new protocol has been used successfully to generate single and multiple-site mutations, deletions, insertion and combined insertion/deletions. The resulted mutants have been successfully used to express the proteins for structure determination (data not shown). The results demonstrated that this new protocol imposed no additional reagent costs but increased the overall success rates.

Methods

Plasmid pDESTSIRV30, pDESTSIRV33 expressing the SIRV proteins (CAG38830 and CAG38833), pDESTAVRA expressing MRSA vraR protein (CAG40961) and pDESTFaBH2 expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa FaBH2 protein (AAG06721)[28] were constructed using a modified Gateway technology with an N-terminal TEV protease cleavable His tag [29]. All the plasmids were propagated in DH5α E. coli cells (Stratagene, La Jolla) and plasmids were prepared using Qiagen miniprep kits (Qiagen, Germany). Pfu DNA polymerase, DpnI restriction enzyme are provided with QuikChange™ kit purchased from Stratagene, additional Pfu DNA polymerase was purchased from Promega when required. All the primers were synthesized by Eurogentec and simply purified by SePOP desalting. The melting temperature was calculated as Tm = 81.5 + 16.6(log([K+]/(1+0.7 [K+])) + 0.41(% [G+C]) – 500/(probe length in base) – 1.0(%mismatch) [30]. The Tm pp and Tm no were calculated for each primer. All primers and their Tm no and Tm pp are detailed in Table 1. PCR cycling was carried out using a Px2 thermal cycler (Thermo Electro Cooperation).

For single-site mutation, deletion or insertion, the PCR reaction of 50 μl contained 2–10 ng of template, 1 μM primer pair, 200 μM dNTPs and 3 units of Pfu DNA polymerase. The PCR cycles were initiated at 95°C for 5 minutes to denature the template DNA, followed by 12 amplification cycles. Each amplification cycle consisted of 95°C for 1 minute, Tm no -5°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 10 minutes or 15 minutes according to the length of the template constructs (about 500 bp per minute for Pfu DNA polymerase). The PCR cycles were finished with an annealing step at Tm pp-5 for 1 minute and an extension step at 72°C for 30 minutes. The PCR products were treated with 5 units of DpnI at 37°C for 2 hours and then 10 μl of each PCR reactions was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The full-length plasmid DNA was quantified by band density analysis against the 1636-bp band (equal to 10% of the mass applied to the gel) of the DNA ladders. An aliquot of 2 μl above PCR products, the PCR products generated using QuickChange™ or generated as described in [13] was transformed respectively into E. coli DH5α competent cells by heat shock. The transformed cells were spread on a Luria-Bertani (LB) plate containing antibiotics and incubated at 37°C over night. The number of colonies was counted and used as an indirect indication of PCR amplification efficiency. Four colonies from each plate were grown and the plasmid DNA was isolated. To verify the mutations, 500 ng of plasmid DNA was mixed with 50 pmole of T7 sequencing primer in a volume of 15 μl. DNA sequencing was carried out using the Sequencing Service, University of Dundee. For multiple site-directed mutations, deletions and insertions, the PCR was carried out in 50 μl of reaction containing 10 ng of template, 1 μM of each of the two primer pairs, 200 μM dNTPs and 3 units of Pfu DNA polymerase. The PCR cycles, DNA quantification, transformation and mutation verification were essentially the same as described above.

Authors' contributions

HL designed the experiments, carried out the practical work and drafted the manuscript. JHN was involved in the research discussion and helped to finalise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out at Scottish Structural Proteomics Facility, which is funded by BBSRC, Scottish Funding Council (SFC) and the University of St. Andrews.

References

  1. Kunkel TA: Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985, 82:488-492. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Cormack B: Introduction of a point mutation by sequential PCR steps.

    Curr Protoc Mol Biol 1994, 2:8.5.7-9. OpenURL

  3. Ishii TM, Zerr P, Xia XM, Bond CT, Maylie J, Adelman JP: Site-directed mutagenesis.

    Methods Enzymol 1998, 293:53-71. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  4. Ling MM, Robinson BH: Approaches to DNA mutagenesis: an overview.

    Anal Biochem 1997, 254:157-178. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Vandeyar MA, Weiner MP, Hutton CJ, Batt CA: A simple and rapid method for the selection of oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutants.

    Gene 1988, 65:129-133. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Sarkar G, Sommer SS: The "megaprimer" method of site-directed mutagenesis.

    Biotechniques 1990, 8:404-407. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  7. Klock HE, Koesema EJ, Knuth MW, Lesley SA: Combining the polymerase incomplete primer extension method for cloning and mutagenesis with microscreening to accelerate structural genomics efforts.

    Proteins 2008, 71:982-994. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Chapnik N, Sherman H, Froy O: A one-tube site-directed mutagenesis method using PCR and primer extension.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 372:255-257. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Kumar R, Rajagopal K: Single-step overlap-primer-walk polymerase chain reaction for multiple mutagenesis without overlap extension.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 377:105-107. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Li X, Qiu Y, Shen Y, Ding C, Liu P, Zhou J, Ma Z: Splicing together different regions of a gene by modified polymerase chain reaction-based site-directed mutagenesis.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 373:398-400. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Tseng WC, Lin JW, Wei TY, Fang TY: A novel megaprimed and ligase-free, PCR-based, site-directed mutagenesis method.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 375:376-378. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Li J, Li C, Xiao W, Yuan D, Wan G, Ma L: Site-directed mutagenesis by combination of homologous recombination and DpnI digestion of the plasmid template in Escherichia coli.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 373:389-391. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Zheng L, Baumann U, Reymond JL: An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:e115. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Mikaelian I, Sergeant A: A general and fast method to generate multiple site directed mutations.

    Nucleic Acids Res 1992, 20:376. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  15. Jensen PH, Weilguny D: Combination primer polymerase chain reaction for multi-site mutagenesis of close proximity sites.

    J Biomol Tech 2005, 16:336-340. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  16. Young L, Dong Q: TAMS technology for simple and efficient in vitro site-directed mutagenesis and mutant screening.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:e11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Kim YG, Maas S: Multiple site mutagenesis with high targeting efficiency in one cloning step.

    Biotechniques 2000, 28:196-198. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  18. Wang W, Malcolm BA: Two-stage PCR protocol allowing introduction of multiple mutations, deletions and insertions using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis.

    Biotechniques 1999, 26:680-682. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  19. Post MA: Site directed mutagenesis by ligation-during-amplification: Change-IT Multiple Site Directed Mutagenesis Kit.

    The FASEB Journal 2007, 21:795.3. OpenURL

  20. Kessler A, Brinkman AB, Oost J, Prangishvili D: Transcription of the rod-shaped viruses SIRV1 and SIRV2 of the hyperthermophilic archaeon sulfolobus.

    J Bacteriol 2004, 186:7745-7753. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  21. Boyle-Vavra S, Yin S, Daum RS: The VraS/VraR two-component regulatory system required for oxacillin resistance in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

    FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006, 262:163-171. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Vovis GF, Lacks S: Complementary action of restriction enzymes endo R-DpnI and Endo R-DpnII on bacteriophage f1 DNA.

    J Mol Biol 1977, 115:525-538. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Rychlik W, Rhoads RE: A computer program for choosing optimal oligonucleotides for filter hybridization, sequencing and in vitro amplification of DNA.

    Nucleic Acids Res 1989, 17:8543-8551. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  24. Aiyar A, Xiang Y, Leis J: Site-directed mutagenesis using overlap extension PCR.

    Methods Mol Biol 1996, 57:177-191. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  25. Hansson MD, Rzeznicka K, Rosenback M, Hansson M, Sirijovski N: PCR-mediated deletion of plasmid DNA.

    Anal Biochem 2008, 375:373-375. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR: Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.

    Gene 1989, 77:51-59. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Seyfang A, Jin JH: Multiple site-directed mutagenesis of more than 10 sites simultaneously and in a single round.

    Anal Biochem 2004, 324:285-291. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, Brinkman FS, Hufnagle WO, Kowalik DJ, Lagrou M, et al.: Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen.

    Nature 2000, 406:959-964. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Liu H, Rudolf J, Johnson KA, McMahon SA, Oke M, Carter L, McRobbie AM, Brown SE, Naismith JH, White MF: Structure of the DNA repair helicase XPD.

    Cell 2008, 133:801-812. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Wetmur JG: DNA probes: applications of the principles of nucleic acid hybridization.

    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1991, 26:227-259. PubMed Abstract OpenURL