Table 2 |
|||
|
Agreement of reviewers on early recanalization in the fascial interposition trial and the cautery study. |
|||
|
Reviewers |
Crude agreement |
Kappa coefficient |
95% CI |
|
|
|||
|
FI trial |
|||
|
1 vs. 2 |
0.89 |
0.60 |
0.53 – 0.68 |
|
1 vs. 3 |
0.95 |
0.84 |
0.79 – 0.89 |
|
2 vs. 3 |
0.90 |
0.58 |
0.49 – 0.66 |
|
All three |
0.87 |
0.68 |
0.64 – 0.72 |
|
Cautery study |
|||
|
1 vs. 2 |
0.93 |
0.40 |
0.22 – 0.58 |
|
1 vs. 3 |
0.88 |
0.35 |
0.21 – 0.49 |
|
2 vs. 3 |
0.91 |
0.42 |
0.27 – 0.57 |
|
All three |
0.86 |
0.38 |
0.34 – 0.43 |
|
|
|||
|
FI = fascial interposition Note: agreement was assessed on two categories (recanalization, no recanalization) in the FI trial and on three categories (recanalization, no recanalization, indeterminate) in the cautery study. |
|||
|
Labrecque et al. BMC Urology 2006 6:25 doi:10.1186/1471-2490-6-25 |
|||