Peer Review reports
From: Is DRE essential for the follow up of prostate cancer patients? A prospective audit of 194 patients
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Pearce |
| 9 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fernand Labrie |
| 7 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Narasimhan Ragavan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Narasimhan Ragavan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Narasimhan Ragavan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Jan 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jan 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-5-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.