Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Owen Hill |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Owen Hill |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Owen Hill |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Buethe |
| 29 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cesar E Ercole |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 19 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Owen Hill |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 19 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-13-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.