Peer Review reports
From: Overall and worst gleason scores are equally good predictors of prostate cancer progression
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Iczkowski |
| 26 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Allan |
| 19 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Iczkowski |
| 6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Allan |
| 23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tapio Visakorpi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.