Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch article

Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis?

Lora Giangregorio1,2,3 email, Alexandra Papaioannou4,7 email, Lehana Thabane7,8 email, Justin deBeer5 email, Ann Cranney6 email, Lisa Dolovich4,7,8 email, Anthony Adili5 email and Jonathan D Adachi4 email

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Ottawa Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

author email corresponding author email

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008, 9:38doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-38

Published: 21 March 2008

Abstract

Background

To evaluate factors associated with whether patients associate their fracture with future fracture risk.

Methods

Fragility fracture patients participated in a telephone interview. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR, [95% CI]) were calculated to identify factors associated with whether patients associate their fracture with increased fracture risk or osteoporosis. Predictors identified in univariate analysis were entered into multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

127 fragility fracture patients (82% female) participated in the study, mean (SD) age 67.5 (12.7) years. An osteoporosis diagnosis was reported in 56 (44%) participants, but only 17% thought their fracture was related to osteoporosis. Less than 50% perceived themselves at increased risk of fracture. The odds of an individual perceiving themselves at increased risk for fracture were higher for those that reported a diagnosis of osteoporosis (OR 22.91 [95%CI 7.45;70.44], p < 0.001), but the odds decreased with increasing age (0.95 [0.91;0.99], p<0.009). The only variable significantly associated with the perception that the fracture was related to osteoporosis was self-reported osteoporosis diagnosis (39.83 [8.15;194.71], p<0.001).

Conclusion

Many fragility fracture patients do not associate their fracture with osteoporosis. It is crucial for physicians to communicate to patients that an osteoporosis diagnosis, increasing age or a fragility fracture increases the risk for future fracture.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.