Table 3

Secondary outcomes at baseline and follow-up.


Group


Secondary outcome measures
Stretching – mean (SD)
Control – mean (SD)
Adjusted mean difference between groups (95% CI)
P-value

Right ankle dorsiflexion§ in degrees




     Baseline
25.8 (± 5.6)
23.6 (± 5.5)


     Follow-up
25.6 (± 5.4)
24.4 (± 5.7)


     Mean change
0.2 (± 4.3)
-0.9 (± 3.0)
0.5 (-0.9 to 2.0)
0.470
Left ankle dorsiflexion§ in degrees




     Baseline
25.8 (± 5.5)
24.0 (± 5.2)


     Follow-up
25.9 (± 5.7)
25.4 (± 6.2)


     Mean change
-0.1 (± 3.7)
-1.3 (± 3.9)
1.0 (-0.6 to 2.6)
0.216
Right Foot Posture†




     Baseline
3 (± 3)
2 (± 2)


     Follow-up
2 (± 3)
2 (± 2)


     Mean change
0 (± 2)
0 (± 1)
0 (-1 to 1)
0.993
Left Foot Posture*




     Baseline
3 (± 3)
3 (± 2)


     Follow-up
3 (± 3)
2 (± 2)


     Mean change
0 (± 2)
0 (± 2)
0 (-1 to 1)
0.841

§ Ankle range of motion (ROM) measured using the Lunge Test [20]

† The Foot Posture Index-6 has a score range of -12 to 12 with negative values for signs of foot supination and positive values for signs of foot pronation [21].

Note: In the results above, the positive adjusted mean difference between groups in improvement for the comparison of ankle dorsiflexion favours stretching because it has greater ankle dorsiflexion.

Radford et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007 8:36   doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-36