The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: Results from a prospective, blinded study
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Cologne University, Joseph-Stelzmann Straße 9, 50931 KOELN, Germany
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 KOELN, Germany
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Cologne University, Joseph-Stelzmann Straße 9, 50931 KOELN, Germany
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 KOELN, Germany
5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 KOELN, Germany
6 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Cologne University, Joseph-Stelzmann Straße 9, 50931 KOELN, Germany
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006, 7:20 doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-20Published: 3 March 2006
The most frequent complications of joint arthroplasty are septic or aseptic loosening of endoprostheses. Preoperative differentiation is essential, since very different treatment methods result from the diagnoses. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical value of 18F-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) as a diagnostic modality for inflammation and loosening in hip and knee joint prostheses.
18F-FDG-PET examinations and multiphase bone scan were performed on hip and knee endoprostheses in 27 patients prior to revision surgical procedures planned for prosthetic loosening. Intact prostheses were found at the opposite site in some patients so that additional 9 joints could be examined with the field of view of 18F-FDG PET. Verification and valuation of the PET and scintigraphic image findings were conducted by comparing them with information combined from intraoperative findings, histopathology, and microbiological investigations.
Evidence of loosening was correctly determined in 76.4% of cases using 18F-FDG-PET, and in 75% of cases using bone scan. The detection of periprosthetic inflammation using 18F-FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 100% for septic cases and of 45.5% in cases of increased abrasion and aseptic foreign-body reactions. However, reliable differentiation between abrasion-induced and bacterial-caused inflammation was not possible using 18F-FDG-PET.
18F-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) allows reliable prediction of peri-prosthetic septical inflammatory tissue reactions. Because of the high sensitivity of this method, a negative PET result in the setting of a diagnostically unclear situation eliminates the need for revision surgery. In contrast, a positive PET result gives no clear differentiation regarding the cause of inflammation.