Study protocol

Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]

Joshua A Cleland¹ , Julie M Fritz² , John D Childs³ and Kornelia Kulig⁴

¹  Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce College 5 Chenell Drive, Concord, NH 03301; and Research Coordinator, Rehabilitation Services, Concord Hospital, Concord, NH, USA

²  Assistant Professor, Division of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Clinical Outcomes Research Scientist, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

³  Assistant Professor and Director of Research, US Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, San Antonio, TX, USA

⁴  Associate Professor of Clinical Physical Therapy, Department of Biokinesiology and PT, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

author email corresponding author email

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006, 7:11doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-11

Published:	10 February 2006

Abstract

Background

Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic thrust manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation procedure. However, recent evidence suggests that different manual therapy techniques may result similar outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of three different manual therapy techniques in a subgroup of patient with low back pain that satisfy the CPR.

Methods/Design

Consecutive patients with LBP referred to physical therapy clinics in one of four geographical locations who satisfy the CPR will be invited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Subjects who agree to participate will undergo a standard evaluation and complete a number of patient self-report questionnaires including the Oswestry Disability Index (OSW), which will serve as the primary outcome measure. Following the baseline examination patients will be randomly assigned to receive the lumbopelvic manipulation used in the development of the CPR, an alternative lumbar manipulation technique, or non-thrust lumbar mobilization technique for the first 2 visits. Beginning on visit 3, all 3 groups will receive an identical standard exercise program for 3 visits (visits 3,4,5). Outcomes of interest will be captured by a therapist blind to group assignment at 1 week (3^rd visit), 4 weeks (6^th visit) and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary aim of the study will be tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the change in OSW score from baseline to 4-weeks (OSW_Baseline – OSW_4-weeks) as the dependent variable. The independent variable will be treatment with three levels (lumbo-pelvic manipulation, alternative lumbar manipulation, lumbar mobilization).

Discussion

This trial will be the first to investigate the effectiveness of various manual therapy techniques for patients with LBP who satisfy a CPR.