Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Effect of urbanization on bone mineral density: A Thai epidemiological study

Chatlert Pongchaiyakul12, Tuan V Nguyen2*, Vongsvat Kosulwat3, Nipa Rojroongwasinkul3, Somsri Charoenkiatkul3 and Rajata Rajatanavin4

Author Affiliations

1 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

2 Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia

3 Institute of Nutrition, Salaya Campus, Mahidol University, Thailand

4 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2005, 6:5  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-6-5

Published: 4 February 2005

Abstract

Background

The incidence of fractures in rural populations is lower than in urban populations, although the reason for this difference is unclear. This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the difference in bone mineral density (BMD), a primary predictor of fracture risk, between urban and rural Thai populations.

Methods

Femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar, Madison, WI) in 411 urban and 436 rural subjects (340 men and 507 women), aged between 20 and 84 years. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from weight and height.

Results

After adjusting for age and body weight in an analysis of covariance model, femoral neck BMD in rural men and women was significantly higher than those in urban men and women (P < 0.001), but the difference was not observed at the lumbar spine. After stratifying by sex, age group, and BMI category, the urban-rural difference in femoral neck BMD became more pronounced in men and women aged <50 years and with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

Conclusions

These data suggest that femoral neck BMD in rural men and women was higher than their counterparts in urban areas. This difference could potentially explain part of the urban-rural difference in fracture incidence.