Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
| 15 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
| 10 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
| 24 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
| 5 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
| 22 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 20 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 1 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 1 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Jun 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Jun 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-6-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.