Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
15 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
10 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
24 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
5 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill |
22 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
20 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Laslett |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Jun 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Jun 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-6-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.