Table 2 |
|||
|
Odds-ratio (OR) of the risk factors for hip fracture in elderly women and men by conditional logistic regression analysis |
|||
|
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
OR (95% CI) adjusted for FNBMD |
OR (95% CI) adjusted for weight |
|
|
|
|||
|
Women |
|||
|
Abdominal fata (-10%) |
1.5 (1.1 to 2.1) |
1.1 (0.7 to 1.5) |
1.1 (0.7 to 1.7) |
|
Weight (-10 kg) |
2.0 (1.4 to 2.8) |
1.3(0.9 to 1.7) |
- |
|
BMI (-4 kg/m2) |
1.7 (1.2 to 2.4) |
1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) |
1.5 (0.7 to 3.0) |
|
FNBMD (-0.12 g/cm2) |
2.4 (1.7 to 3.9) |
- |
2.1 (1.3 to 3.5) |
|
|
|||
|
Men |
|||
|
Abdominal fata (-10%) |
1.2 (0.7 to 2.0) |
1.5 (0.7 to 2.9) |
1.8 (0.8 to 4.0) |
|
Weight (-10 kg) |
1.4 (0.8 to 2.3) |
1.5 (0.7 to 3.2) |
- |
|
BMI (-4 kg/m2) |
1.3 (0.7 to 2.5) |
1.7 (0.6 to 4.5) |
1.3 (0.9 to 1.9) |
|
FNBMD (-0.12 g/cm2) |
2.3 (1.3 to 4.0) |
- |
3.0 (1.3 to 6.5) |
|
|
|||
|
BMI, Body mass index; FNBMD, femoral neck bone mineral density. aAbdominal fat was expressed as percentage of the total soft tissue. Bold-faced values are statistically significant. |
|||
|
Nguyen et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2005 6:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2474-6-11 |
|||
