Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty

Tobias Renkawitz1*, Martin Haimerl2, Lars Dohmen2, Sabine Gneiting2, Philipp Lechler1, Michael Woerner1, Hans-Robert Springorum1, Markus Weber1, Patrick Sussmann1, Ernst Sendtner1 and Joachim Grifka1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany

2 Brainlab AG, R&D Surgery, Feldkirchen, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, 13:65  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-65

Published: 4 May 2012

Abstract

Background

There is a complex interaction among acetabular component position and antetorsion of the femoral stem in determining the maximum, impingement-free prosthetic range-of-motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). By insertion into the femoral canal, stems of any geometry follow the natural anterior bow of the proximal femur, creating a sagittal Femoral Tilt (FT). We sought to study the incidence of FT as measured on postoperative computed tomography scans and its influence on impingement-free ROM in THA.

Methods

The incidence of the postoperative FT was evaluated on 40 computed tomography scans after cementless THA. With the help of a three-dimensional computer model of the hip, we then systematically analyzed the effects of FT on femoral antetorsion and its influence on calculations for a ROM maximized and impingement-free compliant stem/cup orientation.

Results

The mean postoperative FT on CT scans was 5.7° ± 1.8°. In all tests, FT significantly influenced the antetorsion values. Re-calculating the compliant component positions according to the concept of combined anteversion with and without the influence of FT revealed that the zone of compliance could differ by more than 200%. For a 7° change in FT, the impingement-free cup position differed by 4° for inclination when the same antetorsion was used.

Conclusions

A range-of-motion optimized cup position in THA cannot be calculated based on antetorsion values alone. The FT has a significant impact on recommended cup positions within the concept of “femur first” or “combined anteversion”. Ignoring FT may pose an increased risk of impingement as well as dislocation.