Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis – an inter-rater study

Erik Poulsen12*, Henrik Wulff Christensen2, Jeannette Østergaard Penny34, Søren Overgaard34, Werner Vach25 and Jan Hartvigsen12

Author affiliations

1 Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

2 Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark

3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

4 Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

5 Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, 13:242  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-242

Published: 6 December 2012

Abstract

Background

Assessment of range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength is fundamental in the clinical diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) but reproducibility of these measurements has mostly involved clinicians from secondary care and has rarely reported agreement parameters. Therefore, the primary objective of the study was to determine the inter-rater reproducibility of ROM and muscle strength measurements. Furthermore, the reliability of the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was evaluated. Reporting is in accordance with proposed guidelines for the reporting of reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS).

Methods

In a university hospital, four blinded raters independently examined patients with unilateral hip OA; two hospital orthopaedists independently examined 48 (24 men) patients and two primary care chiropractors examined 61 patients (29 men). ROM was measured in degrees (deg.) with a standard two-arm goniometer and muscle strength in Newton (N) using a hand-held dynamometer. Reproducibility is reported as agreement and reliability between paired raters of the same profession. Agreement is reported as limits of agreement (LoA) and reliability is reported with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reliability of the overall assessment of clinical OA is reported as weighted kappa.

Results

Between orthopaedists, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-28–12 deg.] for internal rotation to [-8–13 deg.] for extension. ICC ranged between 0.53 and 0.73, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between orthopaedists, LoA ranged from [-65–47N] for external rotation to [-10 –59N] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.52 and 0.85, highest for abduction. Between chiropractors, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-25–30 deg.] for internal rotation to [-13–21 deg.] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.14 and 0.79, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between chiropractors, LoA ranged between [-80–20N] for external rotation to [-146–55N] for abduction. ICC ranged between 0.38 and 0.81, highest for flexion. Weighted kappa for the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was 0.52 between orthopaedists and 0.65 between chiropractors.

Conclusions

Reproducibility of goniometric and dynamometric measurements of ROM and muscle strength in patients with hip OA is poor between experienced orthopaedists and between experienced chiropractors. Orthopaedists and chiropractors can to a moderate degree differentiate between hips with or without osteoarthritis.

Keywords:
Hip; Examination; Inter-observer; Reliability; Osteoarthritis; Hip