Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
14 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jorg Bahm |
18 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcin Sibinski |
2 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rahul Nath |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
5 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcin Sibinski |
31 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rahul Nath |
28 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
21 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
7 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ahmet Biçer |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
7 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
13 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-74 |
You can find further information about peer review here.