Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Pulmonary Medicine and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Psychometric performance of the CAMPHOR and SF-36 in pulmonary hypertension

James Twiss1*, Stephen McKenna1, Louise Ganderton2345, Sue Jenkins346, Mitra Ben-L’amri1, Kevin Gain247, Robin Fowler234 and Eli Gabbay23478

Author Affiliations

1 Galen Research Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom

2 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

3 Lung Institute of Western Australia, Centre for Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Research, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

4 School of Physiotherapy and Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

5 Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia

6 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia

7 School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

8 School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2013, 13:45  doi:10.1186/1471-2466-13-45

Published: 12 July 2013

Abstract

Background

The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) are widely used to assess patient-reported outcome in individuals with pulmonary hypertension (PH). The aim of the study was to compare the psychometric properties of the two measures.

Methods

Participants were recruited from specialist PH centres in Australia and New Zealand. Participants completed the CAMPHOR and SF-36 at two time points two weeks apart. The SF-36 is a generic health status questionnaire consisting of 36 items split into 8 sections. The CAMPHOR is a PH-specific measure consisting of 3 scales; symptoms, activity limitations and needs-based QoL. The questionnaires were assessed for distributional properties (floor and ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability and construct validity (scores by World Health Organisation functional classification).

Results

The sample comprised 65 participants (mean (SD) age = 57.2 (14.5) years; n(%) male = 14 (21.5%)). Most of the patients were in WHO class 2 (27.7%) and 3 (61.5%). High ceiling effects were observed for the SF-36 bodily pain, social functioning and role emotional domains. Test-retest reliability was poor for six of the eight SF-36 domains, indicating high levels of random measurement error. Three of the SF-36 domains did not distinguish between WHO classes. In contrast, all CAMPHOR scales exhibited good distributional properties, test retest reliability and distinguished between WHO functional classes.

Conclusions

The CAMPHOR exhibited superior psychometric properties, compared with the SF-36, in the assessment of PH patient-reported outcome.